Klosterman

Filing 20

ORDER denying 14 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/29/2010.(NVO)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Gina Marie Klosterman, a married woman, Plaintiff, vs. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-09-2068-PHX-DGC ORDER Plaintiff seeks judicial review of the administrative decision denying her application for social security benefits. Dkt. #1. Plaintiff has filed both an opening brief (Dkt. #13) and a motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #14). The Court's local rules provide for the filing of opening and answering briefs "rather than the filing of motions/cross-motions for summary judgment." LRCiv 16.1(a)-(b); see Dkt. #6 1-2. The opening brief "must set forth all errors which Plaintiff contends entitle [her] to relief." LRCiv 16.1(a). Because Plaintiff has filed a lengthy opening brief addressing alleged errors on the part of the ALJ (Dkt. #13), the Court will deny Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #14) as moot and as improper under Local Rule 16.1. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #14) is denied. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. The Court will address the arguments made in the parties' briefs (Dkt. ##13, 15, 17) in a separate order. DATED this 29th day of March, 2010. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?