Lowe's HIW, Inc. v. Thomas James Civil Design Group dba Thomas Graham Civil Design Group et al
Filing
907
ORDER granting the remaining Defendants' 905 Joint Motion for Dismissal of All Crossclaims With Prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 6/26/2013. (See Order for details)(LFIG)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
Thomas James Civil Design Group Inc., et)
)
al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
And Related Counterclaims,
)
)
And Related Cross-Claims.
)
_________________________________
Lowe’s HIW, Inc.,
No. CV-09-2481-PHX-SMM
ORDER
18
Pending before the Court is the remaining Defendants’ Joint Motion for Dismissal of
19
All Crossclaims With Prejudice. (Doc. 905.) Pursuant to settlement, the remaining
20
defendants, as crossclaimants and crossdefendants, agree to dismiss with prejudice their
21
respective crossclaims. Good cause appearing,
22
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED GRANTING the remaining Defendants’ Joint Motion
for Dismissal of All Crossclaims With Prejudice. (Doc. 905.)
24
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing with prejudice Defendant/Crossclaimant
25
Pacific Lock+Load, Inc.’s crossclaims against EMJ Corporation, Ames Construction, Inc.,
26
Mortimer, Inc., and Kleinfelder, Inc.
27
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing with prejudice Defendant/Crossclaimant
28
Kleinfelder, Inc.’s crossclaims against EMJ Corporation, Ames Construction, Inc., Mortimer,
1
Inc., and Pacific Lock+Load, Inc.
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing with prejudice Defendant/Crossclaimant
3
EMJ Corporation’s crossclaims against Ames Construction, Inc., Mortimer, Inc., Kleinfelder,
4
Inc., and Pacific Lock+Load, Inc.
5
6
7
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing with prejudice Defendants/Crossclaimants
Ames Construction, Inc.’s and Mortimer, Inc.’s crossclaims against EMJ Corporation.
DATED this 26th day of June, 2013.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?