Werner v. Ryan et al

Filing 5

ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. #1) and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by certified mail. Respondents must ans wer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/2/10.(DMT)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
TERMPSREF

WO

MDR

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Chris Werner, Petitioner, vs. Chuck Ryan, et al., Respondents.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. CV 10-0207-PHX-GMS (MEA) ORDER

Petitioner Chris Werner, who is confined in the GEO Group's Central Arizona Correctional Facility in Florence, Arizona, has filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. #1) and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #3). The Court will require an answer to the Petition. I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis indicates that his inmate trust account balance is less than $25.00. Accordingly, the Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. See LRCiv 3.5(b). II. Petition Petitioner was convicted in Pinal County Superior Court, case #CR-2005-00428, of attempted molestation of a child and attempted sexual conduct with a minor. He was sentenced, respectively, to an aggravated, fifteen-year term of imprisonment and lifetime

28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
TERMPSREF

probation. In his Petition, Petitioner names Chuck Ryan as Respondent and the Arizona Attorney General as an Additional Respondent. Petitioner raises two grounds for relief. In Ground One, Petitioner alleges a violation of the "Fourteenth Amendment right to due process which guarantees [an] individual the right to fair notice of whether their conduct is prohibited by law." In Ground Two, he asserts that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel at sentencing. Petitioner alleges that he presented both grounds to the Arizona Court of Appeals. The Court will require Respondents to answer the Petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). III. Warnings A. Address Changes

Petitioner must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Petitioner must not include a motion for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action. B. Copies

Petitioner must serve Respondents, or counsel if an appearance has been entered, a copy of every document that he files. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a). Each filing must include a certificate stating that a copy of the filing was served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d). Also, Petitioner must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice to Petitioner. C. Possible Dismissal

If Petitioner fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the Court). IT IS ORDERED:
-2-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
TERMPSREF

(1) granted. (2)

Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #3) is

The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. #1) and this

Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by certified mail pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. (3) Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service.

Respondents must not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer but may file an answer limited to relevant affirmative defenses, including but not limited to, statute of limitations, procedural bar, or non-retroactivity. If the answer is limited to affirmative defenses, only those portions of the record relevant to those defenses need be attached to the answer. Failure to set forth an affirmative defense in an answer may be treated as a waiver of the defense. Day v. McDonough, 126 S. Ct. 1675, 1684 (2006). If not limited to affirmative defenses, the answer must fully comply with all of the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. (4) answer. (5) This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey pursuant to Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the

Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. DATED this 2nd day of February, 2010.

-3-