DLC Dermacare LLC v. Castillo et al

Filing 183

ORDER, granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 182 Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint; Plaintiff shall have until 7/15/11 to file a second amended complaint consistent with this order; each individual or entity properly named as a Defendant shall be specifically listed in the caption of the complaint. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/7/11.(REW)

Download PDF
    1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 9 10 11 DLC Dermacare LLC, Plaintiff, 12 13 ORDER vs. 14 No. CV-10-333-PHX-DGC Sixta Castillo, R.N., et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint pursuant 18 to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Doc. 182. No response has been 19 filed. The Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part. 20 The motion will be denied to the extent the proposed second amended complaint 21 includes claims against Defendants which have been settled (Doc. 28), voluntarily 22 dismissed with prejudice (Doc. 16), or dismissed pursuant to arbitration provisions 23 (Docs. 145, 154). The motion otherwise is granted pursuant to the liberal amendment 24 policy of Rule 15. 25 IT IS ORDERED: 26 1. 27 28 Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file second amended complaint (Doc. 182) is granted in part and denied in part.     1 2. Plaintiff shall have until July 15, 2011 to file a second amended complaint 2 consistent with this order. Each individual or entity properly named as a 3 Defendant shall be specifically listed in the caption of the complaint. 4 Dated this 7th day of July, 2011. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ‐ 2 ‐ 

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?