Lopez-Jusaino v. United States of America

Filing 11

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10 . ORDER that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (28:2255) 1 is denied with prejudice; and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. ORDER that in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 9/26/11. (TLJ)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

)
)
)
Plaintiff/Respondent,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
Jesus Arturo Lopez-Jusaino,
)
Defendant/Petitioner/Movant.)
)
)
United States of America,

No.

CR 09-0933-PHX-JAT
CV 10-0682-PHX-JAT (JRI)

ORDER

15
Pending before the Court is Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct
16
Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 1). The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and
17
Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 10) recommending that the Motion be denied. The R&R
18
also recommended that the certificate of appealability be denied.
19
Neither party has filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts
20
the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not
21
required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”
22
(emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en
23
banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s
24
findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis
25
in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).
26
Accordingly,
27
28

1
2

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 10)
is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED;

3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct

4

Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 1) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; and the

5

Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

6

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing

7

Section 2255 Cases, in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a

8

certificate of appealability.

9

DATED this 26th day of September, 2011.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-