McClelland v. Ryan et al
Filing
20
ORDER AND CERTIFICATE OF APPEALBILITY AND INFORMA PAUPERIS STATUS - that the 18 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted; that the Clerk entery judgment denying and dismissing petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpu s filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action. Having considered the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability from the order denying Petitioners Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Court FINDS: Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are Denied. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 07/18/11. (ESL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Robert John McClelland,
Petitioner,
10
11
v.
12
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
13
Respondents.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-10-00764-PHX-NVW (JRI)
ORDER
and
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
AND IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS
15
Pending before the court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate
16
Judge Jay R. Irwin (Doc. 18) regarding petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed
17
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1). The R&R recommends that the Petition be denied
18
and dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had
19
fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 13–14 (citing Rule 72(b), Federal
20
Rules of Civil Procedure, and Rule 8(b), Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings).)
21
Petitioner filed objections on July 8, 2011. (Doc. 19.)
22
The court has considered the objections and reviewed the Report and
23
Recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the
24
court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and
25
Recommendation to which specific objections are made). The court agrees with the
26
Magistrate Judge’s determinations, accepts the recommended decision within the meaning
27
of Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and overrules Petitioner’s objections. See 28 U.S.C.
28
§ 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part,
1
2
3
the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge (Doc. 18) is accepted.
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying and
5
dismissing petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254
6
(Doc. 1) with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action.
7
Having considered the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability from the order
8
denying Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Court FINDS: Certificate of
9
Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are Denied. Petitioner has
10
11
not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
DATED this 18th day of July, 2011.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?