Tessema v. Kane
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 11 . ORDER that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed with prejudice. ORDER directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 8/11/10. (TLJ)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. Katrina Kane, Respondent. Yared Tessema, Petitioner,
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. CV10-0925-PHX-SRB ORDER
Petitioner, Yared Tessema, filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on April 27, 2010. On July 10, 2006, Respondent filed a Suggestion of Mootness advising the Court that Petitioner was removed from the United States on June 14, 2010. The Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation on July 14, 2010 recommending that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed with prejudice as moot. In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had 14 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has long since expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court notes that the Petitioner's copy of the Report and Recommendation has been returned by the post-office with the notation "Unclaimed/Not in Custody."
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the order of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.
DATED this 11th day of August, 2010.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?