Shivers v. Phoenix Police Department, City of et al

Filing 9

ORDER the Court construes Plaintiff's 7 "Motion to Dismiss Case Without Prejudice" as a notice of dismissal pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 8/18/10.(TLJ)

Download PDF
Shivers v. Phoenix Police Department, City of et al Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO SC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Corey Demar Shivers, Plaintiff, vs. Phoenix Police Department, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 10-1175-PHX-GMS (JRI) ORDER Plaintiff Corey Demar Shivers, who is confined in the Fourth Avenue Jail in Phoenix, Arizona, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, which the Court dismissed with leave to amend. (Doc. 1, 5.) Plaintiff has filed a motion to dismiss this case without prejudice. (Doc. 7.) Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(I) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides in relevant part that a "plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary[.]" The Court will construe Plaintiff's motion to dismiss without prejudice as a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS ORDERED: (1) The Court construes Plaintiff's "Motion to Dismiss Case Without Prejudice" as a notice of dismissal pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 7.) (2) The Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 prejudice. DATED this 18th day of August, 2010. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?