Smith v. Barrow Neurological Institute et al
Filing
234
ORDER denying plaintiff's 182 motion to modify protective order and/or for authority to provide confidential records to law enforcement, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 8/24/2012.(LFIG)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
Barrow Neurological Institute of St.)
Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, et)
)
al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Leanna Smith,
No. CV 10-01632-PHX-FJM
ORDER
16
17
The court has before it plaintiff's motion to modify protective order and/or for
18
authority to provide confidential records to law enforcement (doc. 182), Banner Health's
19
response (doc. 196), Dignity Health defendants' joinder in response (doc. 199), and plaintiff's
20
reply (doc. 211). On June 28, 2011, this court entered a protective order regarding release
21
of confidential records and information (doc. 69). It ordered "that the production of
22
'Confidential Information' is authorized for the limited purpose of use in this specific civil
23
lawsuit" (id. at 1 (emphasis in original)). Plaintiff seeks an order modifying this protective
24
order to allow release of confidential information about her daughter, C.R., to the United
25
States Department of Justice ("DOJ").
26
After filing her motion here, the juvenile court granted plaintiff's motion requesting
27
release of confidential files from that case. The juvenile court authorized plaintiff to release
28
"any and all confidential files, records and information of Child Protective Services ('CPS')
1
and any and all records, documents, transcripts, testimony or reports in [C.R.'s] Juvenile
2
Court proceeding in her possession to the United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights,
3
Criminal Division ('DOJ') and to any law enforcement or state or federal agency" (doc. 211,
4
ex. A). Plaintiff accordingly narrows her request here to "the Dignity Health records
5
disclosed on June 3, 2012 and not contained in the Juvenile Court case records and files"
6
(doc. 211 at 3).
7
The statutes plaintiff cites in support of her motion do not provide authority for
8
releasing confidential records. A.R.S. § 12-2235 simply defines the doctor-patient privilege.
9
Section 12-2292 renders medical records privileged and confidential. Section 12-2294(A)
10
provides that a health care provider shall disclose medical records without the patient's
11
written authorization "as otherwise required by law or when ordered by a court or tribunal
12
of competent jurisdiction." Section 41-1959 provides that records relating to investigations
13
conducted by child protective services are confidential. Plaintiff also cites § 8-807, which
14
authorizes CPS to release records to governmental agencies. But the only records at issue
15
are records from defendant Dignity Health. Plaintiff has not shown that any statutory
16
authority supports her request to release records to the DOJ.
17
The holder of the doctor-patient privilege is the patient. C.R. was a minor when the
18
records were created, but she was not a minor when they were disclosed in this case.
19
Plaintiff is no longer C.R.'s legal guardian. C.R. is now the holder of the doctor-patient
20
privilege with respect to her own medical records and she has not waived this privilege.
21
"[M]odification of a protective order, like its original entry, is left to the discretion of
22
the district court." United Nuclear Corp. v. Cranford Ins. Co., 905 F.2d 1424, 1427 (10th
23
Cir. 1990) (cited in Beckman Indus., Inc. v. Int'l Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 470, 472 (9th Cir. 1992)).
24
In the parties' joint motion for restricted release of confidential records, the parties stated that
25
the "release of the files, records and information is necessary and for the limited purpose of
26
use in this specific civil lawsuit." (Doc. 61 at 3 (emphasis in original)). Based on this
27
representation, the court ordered production of confidential information, including medical
28
records, for use in this specific civil lawsuit. Defendants released records in reliance on the
-2-
1
court's protective order. Medical records are privileged and confidential. The patient here
2
has not waived her privilege. Plaintiff has not made the showing necessary to justify
3
modifying the protective order.
4
IT IS ORDERED DENYING plaintiff's motion to modify protective order and/or
5
for authority to provide confidential records to law enforcement (doc. 182). This, of course,
6
is without prejudice to the right, if any, of any non-party to seek records directly from
7
defendants.
8
DATED this 24th day of August, 2012.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?