Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Acella Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
Filing
236
ORDER denying 233 Motion to Seal Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law and Accompanying Statement of Material Facts. The Clerk shall strike the Proposed documents at Docket entries 234 and 235. Within five days of the d ate of this Order, either Acella shall resubmit the stricken documents for filing into the public record or the parties may file a Stipulation containing compelling reasons for sealing the Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and acco mpanying Statement of Material Facts and/or for sealing only certain Exhibits to the Statements of Material Facts. FURTHER ORDERED granting 230 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. The Clerk shall file into the record the Proposed Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law (Redacted) currently lodged at docket entry 231 . Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 8/3/11.(MAP)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation,
Plaintiff,
10
11
vs.
12
Acella Pharmaceuticals Incorporated,
13
Defendant.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 10-1780-PHX-JAT
ORDER
15
16
Defendant Acella Pharmaceuticals, LLC has filed a Motion for Leave to File Its
17
Unredacted Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law and Accompanying
18
Statement of Material Facts Under Seal (Doc. 233). In support of its Motion to Seal, Acella
19
asserts that counsel for both parties have designated certain Exhibits to Acella’s Motion for
20
Summary Judgment, and facts found in those Exhibits, as “Confidential” and “Attorneys’
21
Eyes Only” pursuant to their Protective Order. The parties’ designation of certain items as
22
confidential pursuant to a protective order does not justify sealing a dispositive motion.
23
The Court starts with a strong presumption in favor of public access to court records.
24
Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003). A party that
25
wants to seal any part of a dispositive motion must overcome this strong presumption with
26
compelling reasons for sealing. Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172,
27
1179 (9th Cir. 2006). To seal any part of non-dispositive motion, a party still must
28
demonstrate good cause. Id. at 1180.
1
Acella offers no reason for sealing other than the parties’ designation of certain items
2
as confidential. Acella has not met its burden of overcoming the strong presumption of open
3
access to court documents with compelling reasons. The Court therefore will deny the
4
Motion to Seal.
5
Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 5.6(e), the Court will strike the Sealed
6
Lodged Proposed Unredacted Statement of Material Facts (Doc. 235) and the Sealed Lodged
7
Proposed Unredacted Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 234). Within five days of the
8
date of this Order, either Acella shall resubmit the stricken documents for filing into the
9
public record or the parties may file a Stipulation containing compelling reasons for sealing.
10
If the parties choose to file a Stipulation, the Court encourages them to seek to seal as little
11
as possible.
12
Acella also filed a Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages for Motion for Summary
13
Judgment and Memorandum of Law (230). Acella seeks an extra two pages for its
14
Memorandum. Finding good cause, the Court will grant the Motion.
15
Accordingly,
16
IT IS ORDERED DENYING Acella’s Motion to Seal Defendant’s Motion for
17
Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law and Accompanying Statement of Material
18
Facts (Doc. 233). The Clerk shall strike the Proposed documents at Docket entries 234 and
19
235. Within five days of the date of this Order, either Acella shall resubmit the stricken
20
documents for filing into the public record or the parties may file a Stipulation containing
21
compelling reasons for sealing the Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary
22
Judgment and accompanying Statement of Material Facts and/or for sealing only certain
23
Exhibits to the Statements of Material Facts.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
-2-
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED GRANTING Acella’s Motion for Leave to File
2
Excess Pages (Doc. 230). The Clerk shall file into the record the Proposed Motion for
3
Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law (Redacted) currently lodged at docket entry
4
231.
DATED this 3rd day of August, 2011.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?