De La Rosa v. Arizona State University et al

Filing 24

ORDER granting 20 Motion to Dismiss; granting 22 Motion to Amend/Correct. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before 5/31/2011. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint within 14 days of its service. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/25/2011.(NVO)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Juliet M. De La Rosa, an individual, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 No. CV-10-1803-PHX-DGC ORDER vs. Arizona State University; and the Arizona Board of Regents, 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff’s complaint asserts a violation of the American with Disabilities Act. 16 Doc. 1. Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim to 17 relief. Doc. 20. Plaintiff concedes that her ADA claim fails as a matter of law, but seeks 18 leave to amend to assert a claim under the Rehabilitation Act. Doc. 22. Defendants do 19 not oppose the proposed amendment. Doc. 23. 20 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 21 1. 22 Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 20) is granted. The complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed without prejudice. 23 2. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Doc. 22) is 24 granted. Plaintiff shall file the proposed amended complaint (Doc. 22-1) by May 31, 25 2011. 26 27 28 1 2 3 3. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint within 14 days after its service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3). Dated this 25th day of May, 2011. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?