Xcentric Ventures, LLC, et al., v. Richeson

Filing 30

MOTION to Strike DEFENDANT SHAWN RICHESONS MOTION FOR RULE 11(C) SANCTIONS AGAINST MARIA CRIMI SPETH AND JABURG & WILK, P.C. (DOC. NO. 27 ) by Jaburg & Wilk, P.C.. (Speth, Maria) Modified on 10/1/2010 to create document linkage.(ESL).

Download PDF
Xcentric Ventures, LLC, et al., v. Richeson Doc. 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. Attorneys At Law 3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 248-1000 Maria Crimi Speth (012574) JABURG & WILK, P.C. 3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 mcs@jaburgwilk.com (602) 248-1000 David S. Gingras (021097) Gingras Law Office, PLLC 4072 E Mountain Vista Dr. Phoenix, AZ 85048 Tel.: (480) 668-3623 David.Gingras@webmail.azbar.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC, an Arizona limited liability corporation, and JABURG & WILK, P.C., a professional corporation, Plaintiffs, v. SHAWN RICHESON, Defendant. Pursuant to Rule 12(f), Fed.R.Civ.P., Plaintiff Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. hereby requests this Court issue an Order striking the recently filed pleading of Defendant Shawn Richeson captioned as "Motion for Rule 11(c) Sanctions Against Maria Crimi Speth & Jaburg and Wilk P.C." (Doc. No. 27). Defendant Richeson has failed to comply with Rule 11, Fed.R.Civ.P. in the filing of this Motion. Because the Motion for Sanctions is procedurally improper, it must be stricken. Pursuant to Rule 11(c)(2), any Motion for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11(b): must be served under Rule 5, but it must not be filed or be presented to the court if the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention, or denial is 10297-73/LAR/LAR/832169_v1 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: 2:10-cv-1931-PHX-NVW MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT SHAWN RICHESON'S MOTION FOR RULE 11(C) SANCTIONS AGAINST MARIA CRIMI SPETH AND JABURG & WILK, P.C. (DOC. NO. 27) Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. Attorneys At Law 3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 248-1000 withdrawn or appropriately corrected within 21 days after service or within another time the court sets. Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 11(c)(2). Defendant Richeson has filed his Motion for Sanctions without first serving it and waiting twenty-one days before filing it. On this basis alone, the Motion for Sanctions must be stricken as being procedurally improper. In addition, Defendant Richeson is using this Court case as a forum to defame and harass Plaintiffs and to cause Plaintiffs to incur unnecessary expenses and not for any legitimate purpose. DATED this 30th day of September, 2010. JABURG & WILK, P.C. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 10297-73/LAR/LAR/832169_v1 s/Maria Crimi Speth Maria Crimi Speth David S. Gingras Attorneys for Plaintiffs Certificate of Service I hereby certify that on the 30th day of September, 2010, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing. I have also caused to be delivered to Defendant, who is not registered with the CM/ECF System, a copy of the attached document by First Class Mail and E-Mail: Shawn Richeson 1906 Twilight Drive Killeen, Texas 76543 Shawn@ClickaNerd.com Defendant Pro Per s/Debra Gower

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?