Xcentric Ventures, LLC, et al., v. Richeson

Filing 32

ORDER that Plaintiffs' 29 Motion to Strike Defendant Shawn Richeson's Proposed 2 Page Trial Exhibit is granted, and Doc. 28 is stricken, without prejudice to any proper future use of the exhibit; that Motion to Strike Defendant Shawn Richeson's 30 Motion for Rule 11(c) Sanctions Against Maria Speth and Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. is denied, without prejudice to Plaintiffs filing a response to the Motion for Rule 11(c) Sanctions. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 10/01/10. (ESL)

Xcentric Ventures, LLC, et al., v. Richeson

Doc. 32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 XCentric Ventures, LLC, an Arizona) limited corporation, and Jaburg & Wilk,) ) P.C., a professional corporation, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) ) Shawn Richeson, ) ) Defendant. ) ) No. CV 10-1931-PHX-NVW ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Before the Court are Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendant Shawn Richeson's Proposed 2 Page Trial Exhibit (Doc. 29) and Motion to Strike Defendant Shawn Richeson's Motion for Rule 11(c) Sanctions Against Maria Speth and Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. (Doc. 30). Proposed trial exhibits are filed with the Clerk of the Court, so Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendant Shawn Richeson's Proposed 2 Page Trial Exhibit (Doc. 29) will be granted for that reason only. The Court does not decide at this time whether Defendant's proposed exhibit may be filed for a proper purpose. The Motion to Strike Defendant Shawn Richeson's Motion for Rule 11(c) Sanctions Against Maria Speth and Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. (Doc. 30) is improper itself, as it is really a substantive response to Defendant's Motion for Sanctions Against Maria Speth and Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. (Doc. 27). LRCiv 7.2(m)(1).

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendant Shawn Richeson's Proposed 2 Page Trial Exhibit (Doc. 29) is granted, and Doc. 28 is stricken, without prejudice to any proper future use of the exhibit. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motion to Strike Defendant Shawn Richeson's Motion for Rule 11(c) Sanctions Against Maria Speth and Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. (Doc. 30) is denied, without prejudice to Plaintiffs filing a response to the Motion for Rule 11(c) Sanctions (Doc. 27). Dated: October 1, 2010.

-2-