Hogg et al v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 15

ORDER granting 9 Defendant Maricopa County Sheriff's Department's Motion to Dismiss Party; party Maricopa County Sheriff's Department terminated. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 12/20/10.(LSP)

Hogg et al v. Gandara et al

Doc. 15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Cynthia Hogg and Deon Runge, a married) ) couple, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Maricopa County Sheriff's Department, et) ) al., ) ) Defendant. ) )

No. CV 10-1998-PHX-MHM ORDER

In an October 21, 2010 Order, this Court granted Plaintiffs' counsel's motion to withdraw. (Doc. 14). In the same Order, the Court gave Plaintiff until November 3, 2010, to secure new counsel and warned Defendants that if they failed to secure new counsel by that date, the Court would assume they were proceeding pro-se. The Court further ordered that if Defendants elected to proceed pro-se, they must file a response to Defendant Maricopa County Sheriff's Department's Motion to Dismiss no later than November 18, 2010, and that their failure to file such a response would result in this Court summarily granting Defendant's motion pursuant to LRCiv 7.2(I). Plaintiff have neither hired a new attorney nor responded to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. ///

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Defendant Maricopa County Sheriff's Department's Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 9). DATED this 20th day of December, 2010.

-2-