Liberty Life Insurance Company v. Myers et al
Filing
295
ORDER granting 278 Motion for Leave to Provide an Itemized List. The Clerk of the Court shall file the lodged proposed itemized list 279 ; however, the Clerk of the Court need not take any further action on the list. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/17/13.(TLJ)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Liberty Life Insurance Company,
No. CV 10-2024-PHX-JAT
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
Eric LungMyers, et al.,
13
ORDER
Defendants.
14
15
Pending before the Court is pro se Defendant Eric LungMyers’ (“Defendant”)
16
Motion for Leave to provide the Court with an itemized list of items requiring redaction in
17
Court docket documents 228 & 229. (Doc. 278).
18
Defendant wants to provide the Court with an itemized list of thirty-five items that
19
Plaintiff did not redact in Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 228) and
20
Plaintiff’s statement of facts in support of the motion for partial summary judgment (Doc.
21
229). On the same day that Defendant filed this pending motion, he filed an itemized list
22
of the unredacted items in Plaintiff’s filings. (Doc. 279).
23
Prior to Defendant filing the pending motion, on April 19, 2012, Defendant filed a
24
motion to strike (Doc. 245) Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and the
25
statement of facts because Defendant accused Plaintiff of filing these motions without
26
following the redaction requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. On February
27
11, 2013, the Court entered orders granting Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary
28
judgment in its entirety (Doc. 280) and denying Defendant’s motion to strike (Doc. 276).
1
On the same day, almost ten months after filing the motion to strike, Defendant filed the
2
pending motion.
3
Defendant’s pending motion asks the Court for no more than permission to
4
provide the Court with a list of items that Defendant believes Plaintiff should have
5
redacted. To the extent that this is all Defendant’s motion is asking, the motion is granted.
6
Defendant has provided the Court with such a list (Doc. 279). The Court has already
7
denied Plaintiff’s motion to strike and explained the reasons for doing so. See (Doc. 276).
8
Based on the foregoing,
9
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Eric LungMyers Motion for Leave to Provide
10
an Itemized List of Items Requiring Redaction (Doc. 278) is granted. The Clerk of the
11
Court shall file the lodged proposed itemized list (Doc. 279); however, the Clerk of the
12
Court need not take any further action on the list.
13
Dated this 17th day of September, 2013.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?