Johnson v. Arizona, State of

Filing 35

ORDER denying the Motion for Reconsideration 34 . This case shall remain closed. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 9/10/12. (TLJ)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Eugene Boyd Johnson,
Petitioner,

10
11

vs.

12
The State of Arizona, et al.,
13
Respondents.
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV-10-2096-PHX-GMS
ORDER

15
16

On June 25, 2012, after considering Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,

17

Respondent’s Answer, and Magistrate Judge Logan’s Report and Recommendations (“R &

18

R”), the Court denied the petition. (Doc. 30). The factual background and legal issues in this

19

case are all set forth in the order denying the Petition, and will not be repeated here. On July

20

10, Petitioner submitted a “Second Response and Objections” to the R & R, which was

21

identical in all material respects to his first set of objections. (Doc. 32). The Court interpreted

22

this Second Response and Objections as a motion for reconsideration and on July 27, 2012,

23

denied the motion. (Doc. 33). On August 9, 2012, Petitioner submitted a “Third Response

24

and Objections” which is identical in all material respects to both the first set of objections

25

and to his Second Response and Objections. (Doc. 34). Again, the Court will interpret this

26

filing as a motion for reconsideration, and will, for the reasons set forth in its July 27th

27

Order, deny this motion.

28

///

1
2
3

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED denying the Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 34).
This case shall remain closed.
DATED this 10th day of September, 2012.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-