Morgan v. Ryan et al

Filing 40

ORDER the Report and Recommendation 38 is adopted. ORDER the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is dismissed with prejudice as time barred. ORDER a Certficate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because the denial of the motion is justified by a plain procedural bar. Signed by Chief Judge Roslyn O Silver on 12/16/11. (TLJ)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 James Michael Morgan, Petitioner, 10 11 vs. 12 Charles L. Ryan, et. al., 13 Respondents. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-10-2215-PHX-ROS ORDER 15 16 On November 28, 2011, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation. 17 (Doc. 38). Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and Recommendation. No objections 18 being made, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation in full. 19 A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 20 recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party has 21 filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendations, the district 22 court’s review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id.; see also United States v. Reyna- 23 Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 24 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of 25 factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, but not otherwise.”) (internal 26 quotations and citations omitted). 27 Accordingly, 28 IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) is ADOPTED. 1 2 IT IS ORDERED the Petitioner for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as time barred. 3 IT IS ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma 4 pauperis on appeal is denied because the denial of the motion is justified by a plain 5 procedural bar. 6 DATED this 16th day of December, 2011. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?