Chow v. Kane
Filing
14
ORDER that the 13 Report and Recommendations is accepted. The Petition for Writ of Habaes Corpus is dismissed as moot. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 05/05/11. (ESL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
No. CV10-2391 PHX DGC (DKD)
Kin Sing Chow,
Petitioner,
10
11
vs.
12
ORDER
Katrina S. Kane,
Respondent.
13
14
15
Petitioner Kin Sing Chow has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
16
28 U.S.C. § 2241. Doc. 1. United States Magistrate Judge David K. Duncan has issued a
17
report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the petition be dismissed as
18
moot. Doc . 13. No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to
19
review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn,
20
474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.
21
2003). The Court will accept the R&R and dismiss the petition.
22
IT IS ORDERED:
23
1.
The R&R (Doc. 13) is accepted.
24
2.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is dismissed as moot.
25
3.
A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on
26
27
28
appeal are denied
1
4.
The Clerk is directed to terminate this action.
2
Dated this 5th day of May, 2011.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
‐ 2 ‐
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?