Labatad v. Corrections Corporation of America et al

Filing 42

ORDER denying 37 Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge David K Duncan on 6/1/11.(DMT)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Corrections Corporation of America, et al.,) ) ) Defendants. ) ) Keone Labatad, No. CIV 10-2619-PHX-ROS (DKD) ORDER 15 This matter arises on Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Second Request) 16 (Doc. 37). Plaintiff’s first request for the appointment of counsel was denied March 3, 2011 17 (Doc. 24). 18 Plaintiff has again failed to demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits, and has 19 not shown that he is experiencing difficulty in litigating this case because of the complexity of 20 the issues involved. After reviewing the file, and Defendants’ Response in Opposition to 21 Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. 41), the Court determines that this case does not present exceptional 22 circumstances requiring the appointment of counsel. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 37). DATED this 1st day of June, 2011.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?