Donahoe et al v. Arpaio et al
ORDER granting/denying in part 270 Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaints of Plaintiffs Stapley, Donahoe and Wilson. FURTHER ORDERED granting/denying in part 271 Thomas Defendants' Consolidated Motion to Dismiss Claims in Plaintiffs& #039; Amended Complaints Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), as the Claims are Barred by Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity FURTHER ORDERED granting/denying in part 283 Defendant Arpaios' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCivP 8, 10, and 12(b)(6) Applica ble Collectively to the Newly Amended Complaints Filed by Plaintiffs Donahoe, Mundell, Schuerman, Stapley, Wilcox, and Wilson FURTHER ORDERED granting/denying in part 284 Defendants Lisa Aubuchon and Peter R. Pestalozzi's Motion to Dismiss Se cond Amended Complaints Pursuant to Rules 8(a)(2), 8(d)(1) (as to Plaintiffs Wilcox, Mundell and Stapley) and 12(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (as to Plaintiffs Wilcox, Mundell, Stapley, Wilson, Schuerman, and Donahoe) FURTHER ORDERED denying 315 Defendants Peter and Mary Spaw's Motion to Dismiss. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FULL/COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 4/9/12. (MAP)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?