Donahoe et al v. Arpaio et al

Filing 548

ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Wilcox's Motion for Award ofAttorneys' Fees and Expenses (Doc. 535) is granted in the amount of $9,935.83. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk enter a further judgment in favor of Plaintiffs Mary Rose Wilcox and Earl Wilcox against Maricopa County in the amount of $9,935.83, with interest thereon at the federal rate of.21% per annum from the date of judgment until paid. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 8/7/12.(LAD)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Gary Donahoe and
husband and wife,

10

Cherie

Donahoe,

No. CV 10-02756-PHX-NVW
CONSOLIDATED WITH:

Plaintiffs,

11

vs.

12

Sheriff Joseph Arpaio and Ava Arpaio,
husband and wife; Andrew Thomas and
Anne Thomas, husband and wife; Lisa
Aubuchon and Peter R. Pestalozzi, wife and
husband; Deputy Chief David Hendershott
and Anna Hendershott, husband and wife;
Peter Spaw and Jane Doe Spaw, husband
and wife; Maricopa County, a municipal
entity; Jon Does I-X; Jane Does I-X; Black
Corporations I-V; and White Partnerships IV,

13
14
15
16
17
18

Defendants.

19
20

Sandra Wilson and Paul Wilson, husband
and wife,

21

CV 10-02758-PHX-NVW

Plaintiffs,

22

vs.

23

Sheriff Joseph Arpaio and Ava Arpaio,
husband and wife; et al.,

24
25

Defendants.

26
27
28
-1 

1
2
3
4
5
6

Conley D. Wolfswinkel, a single man;
Brandon D. Wolswinkel, a single man;
Ashton A. Wolfswinkel, a single man;
Vanderbilt Farms, LLC, an Arizona limited
liability company; ABCDW, LLC, an
Arizona limited liability company; Stone
Canyon, LLC, an Arizona limited liability
company; Vistoso Partners, LLC, an
Arizona limited liability company; and W
Harquahala, LLC, an Arizona limited
liability company;

7
8
9
10

Plaintiffs,
vs.
Sheriff Joseph Arpaio and Ava Arpaio,
husband and wife; et al.,
Defendants.

11
12
13

Mary Rose Wilcox and Earl Wilcox, wife
and husband,

16
17
18

vs.
Sheriff Joseph Arpaio and Ava Arpaio,
husband and wife; et al.,
Defendants.
Donald T. Stapley, Jr. and Kathleen
Stapley, husband and wife,

21
22
23

CV 11-00902-PHX-NVW
ORDER

19
20

CV 11-00473-PHX-NVW

Plaintiffs,

14
15

CV 11-00116-PHX-NVW

Plaintiffs,
Applicable to CV 11-00473-PHX-NVW
vs.
Sheriff Joseph Arpaio and Ava Arpaio,
husband and wife; et al.,
Defendants.

24
25

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Wilcox’s Motion for Award of Attorneys’ Fees and

26

Expenses (Doc. 535). The time to file a response has expired, and no response has been

27

filed. LRCiv. 7.2(c). Failure to file a timely response “may be deemed a consent to the .

28
-2 

1

. . . granting of the motion and the Court may dispose of the motion summarily.” LRCiv

2

7.2(i). The Court has considered the Motion and grants it on its merits. The motion of

3

County Treasurer Hoskins was in further breach of Maricopa County’s settlement

4

agreement with Plaintiff Wilcox. The additional attorney fees and expenses incurred in

5

successfully defeating the motion will be awarded against Maricopa County and in favor

6

of Plaintiff Wilcox for the same reasons as the previous award. (Doc. 461 at 18.)

7
8

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Wilcox’s Motion for Award of
Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses (Doc. 535) is granted in the amount of $9,935.83.

9

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk enter a further judgment in favor of

10

Plaintiffs Mary Rose Wilcox and Earl Wilcox against Maricopa County in the amount of

11

$9,935.83, with interest thereon at the federal rate of .21% per annum from the date of

12

judgment until paid.

13

Dated this 7th day of August, 2012.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3