Farnsworth v. Ryan et al
Filing
13
ORDER - that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) is accepted and adopted by the Court. FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custod y is denied and that this action is dismissed with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue and that the petitioner shall not be allowed to appeal in forma pauperis because the dismissal of the habeas petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 5/2/11. (KMG)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
10
Lewis K. Farnsworth,
Petitioner,
11
12
13
14
vs.
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-10-2803-PHX-PGR (DKD)
ORDER
15
16
Having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate
17
Judge Duncan notwithstanding that no party has filed any objections to the
18
Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge correctly
19
concluded that the petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, timely filed
20
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, should be dismissed because both of the
21
petitioner’s claims raised therein were procedurally defaulted inasmuch as the
22
petitioner did not fairly present either one to the state courts, and that his failure
23
to do so cannot be excused because the petitioner has not established any cause
24
for the procedural defaults or any prejudice arising from the alleged constitutional
25
errors, or that a fundamental miscarriage of justice will result from the Court not
26
deciding these defaulted claims. Therefore,
1
2
IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
(Doc. 12) is accepted and adopted by the Court.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner’s Petition Under 28 U.S.C.
4
§ 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is denied and
5
that this action is dismissed with prejudice.
6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue
7
and that the petitioner shall not be allowed to appeal in forma pauperis because
8
the dismissal of the habeas petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and
9
jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable.
10
11
12
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter
judgment accordingly.
DATED this 2nd day of May, 2011.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?