Halloum v. Ryan et al

Filing 31

ORDER re 5 Order: IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Jackson is dismissed without prejudice. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 8/5/11. (LAD)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Ammar Dean Halloum,
Plaintiff,

10
11

vs.

12
Charles Ryan, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV 11-97-PHX-RCB (JRI)
ORDER

15
16

Plaintiff Ammar Dean Halloum, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison

17

Complex-Tucson, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an

18

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. In a January 27, 2011 Order, the Court ordered

19

Defendants Huggins, Turner, Hernandez, Brier, Eherdt, Rhihibe, and Itenberg to answer

20

Counts I, III, IV, V, VI, and VII of the Complaint, and dismissed the remaining claims and

21

Defendants without prejudice.

22

In the January 27, 2011 Order, the Court dismissed Defendant Jackson in its

23

discussion of Plaintiff’s claims. However, Defendant Jackson’s name was omitted from the

24

list of Defendants to be dismissed in the “It Is Ordered” section of the order. The Court will

25

correct the omission. Accordingly,

26

...

27

...

28

...

1

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Jackson is dismissed without prejudice.

2

DATED this 5th day of August, 2011.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-