Allen v. Quest Online LLC et al

Filing 189

ORDER granting 176 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend, Plaintiff is directed to immediately file his proposed Amended Complaint; and denying 186 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. See PDF document for details. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/16/12.(LSP)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Quest Online, LLC, an Arizona Limited ) ) Liability Company, et. Al. , ) ) Defendant. ) ) David Allen, a married man, No. CV-11-138-PHX-GMS ORDER 16 17 Pending before the Court are: Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Complaint (Doc. 176), 18 and (2) Plaintiff’s Motion For Reconsideration (Doc. 186). For the reasons stated below, 19 Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend is granted. Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration is denied. 20 In light of the Court permitting Mr. Allen to withdraw his self-designation as a public figure 21 as amended from his earlier complaint, the Court will revise the scheduling order as further 22 set forth below. 23 Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend is granted. Although not much has been added to the 24 trade libel and civil conspiracy claims, proposed counts four and five, sufficient pleadings 25 have been made to defeat a motion to dismiss at this stage of the litigation. To the extent that 26 Plaintiff adds a count for fraudulent misrepresentation, the claim is barely pleaded with 27 sufficient particularity as is required by the rule. Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b) (“[i]n alleging fraud 28 or mistake, a party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud.”) It 1 will, therefore, not be dismissed as failing to state a claim. Therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion to 2 Amend is granted. Plaintiff will file an amended complaint in the form of that proposed. 3 The deadlines for disclosing experts and opinions, together with responses and rebuttals will 4 be extended as follows. 5 1. The party with the burden of proof on an issue shall provide full and complete 6 expert disclosures as required by Rule 26(a)(2)(A)-(C) of the Federal Rules of Civil 7 Procedure no later than April 6, 2012. 8 9 10 11 2. Responding party shall provide full and complete expert disclosures as required by Rule 26(a)(2)(A)-(C) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than May 11, 2012. 3. Rebuttal expert disclosures, if any, shall be made no later than June 1, 2012. Rebuttal experts shall be limited to responding to opinions stated by initial experts. 12 No other deadline shall be changed. 13 The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration. Motions for 14 reconsideration are disfavored. Nor should such motions ask the Court to “rethink what the 15 court has already thought through–rightly or wrongly.” See United States v. Rezzonico, 32 16 F.Supp.2d 1112, 1116 (D. Ariz. 1998) (quoting Above the Belt, Inc. v. Mel Bohannon 17 Roofing, Inc., 99 F.R.D. 99, 101 (E.D. Va. 1983)). That is all that Plaintiff’s Motion for 18 Reconsideration does. It is, therefore, denied. 19 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 20 1. 21 Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (Doc. 176) is granted and Plaintiff is directed to immediately file his proposed Amended Complaint. 22 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 186) is denied. 23 3. The following discovery deadlines are extended as follows: 24 a. The party with the burden of proof on an issue shall provide full and 25 complete expert disclosures as required by Rule 26(a)(2)(A)-(C) of the Federal Rules of Civil 26 Procedure no later than April 6, 2012. 27 28 b. Responding party shall provide full and complete expert disclosures as required by Rule 26(a)(2)(A)-(C) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than May -2- 1 11, 2012. 2 c. 3 Rebuttal expert disclosures, if any, shall be made no later than June 1, 2012. Rebuttal experts shall be limited to responding to opinions stated by initial experts. 4 d. All other deadlines in the Case Management Order will remain the same. 5 DATED this 16th day of February, 2012. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?