Greene v. Espiritu et al

Filing 33

ORDER denying without prejudice plaintiff's 29 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge David K Duncan on 2/22/12.(LAD)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Brian Henry Greene,
Plaintiff,

10
11

vs.

12

Redentor Espiritu, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV 11-0206-PHX-NVW (DKD)

ORDER

15

This matter arises on Plaintiff’s Motion for the Appointment of Counsel (Second

16

Request) (Doc. 29). Plaintiff requests that the court appoint counsel because the issues in this

17

matter are complex and because of medical issues.

18

Plaintiff’s first request to appoint legal counsel was denied on September 25, 2011 (Doc.

19

25). Defendants oppose Plaintiff’s request (Doc. 31). Plaintiff has again failed to demonstrate

20

a likelihood of success on the merits, or show that he is experiencing difficulty in litigating this

21

case because of the complexity or medical issues involved. Accordingly,

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for the Appointment of Counsel
(Doc. 29) is DENIED without prejudice.
DATED this 22nd day of February, 2012.