Greene v. Espiritu et al

Filing 33

ORDER denying without prejudice plaintiff's 29 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge David K Duncan on 2/22/12.(LAD)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Brian Henry Greene, Plaintiff, 10 11 vs. 12 Redentor Espiritu, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 11-0206-PHX-NVW (DKD) ORDER 15 This matter arises on Plaintiff’s Motion for the Appointment of Counsel (Second 16 Request) (Doc. 29). Plaintiff requests that the court appoint counsel because the issues in this 17 matter are complex and because of medical issues. 18 Plaintiff’s first request to appoint legal counsel was denied on September 25, 2011 (Doc. 19 25). Defendants oppose Plaintiff’s request (Doc. 31). Plaintiff has again failed to demonstrate 20 a likelihood of success on the merits, or show that he is experiencing difficulty in litigating this 21 case because of the complexity or medical issues involved. Accordingly, 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for the Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 29) is DENIED without prejudice. DATED this 22nd day of February, 2012.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?