Islam v. Kane

Filing 15

ORDER granting 14 Petitioner's Motion to Withdraw Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Clerk of the Court shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 11/8/11.(TLJ)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 Jomela Islam, Petitioner, 11 12 13 14 vs. Katrina Kane, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-11-0515-PHX-PGR ORDER 15 16 In her Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a 17 Person in Federal Custody, the petitioner sought her release from federal 18 immigration detention on the ground that her prolonged detention since the order 19 removing her to Bangladesh became final violated Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 20 678 (2001). On September 20, 2011, the Court accepted the Magistrate Judge’s 21 Report and Recommendation and determined that the petitioner’s habeas petition 22 would be granted and that the respondent would be ordered to release the 23 petitioner from custody unless the respondent effectuated the petitioner’s removal 24 from the United States by October 31, 2011. On October 4, 2011, the respondent 25 filed a Notice to the Court and Suggestion of Mootness (Doc. 13), wherein she 26 stated that the petitioner had been deported on September 28, 2011. On October 1 8, 2011, the petitioner, through counsel, filed a Motion to Withdraw Petition for 2 Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 14), wherein she acknowledged that her petition 3 was moot because she had been removed to Bangladesh on September 28, 4 2011. Therefore, 5 IT IS ORDERED that petitioner Jomela Islam’s Motion to Withdraw Petition 6 for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 14) is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall 7 terminate this action. 8 DATED this 8th day of November, 2011. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?