Trotter v. United States of America
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 13 of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying 12 movant's Motion to Amend/Supplement Record. The movant's Amended Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 4) is denied and that this action is dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis are denied because the dismissal of the movants § 2255 motion is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 4/11/12. (LSP)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
10
United States of America,
Plaintiff/Respondent,
11
12
13
14
vs.
Joshua Wayne Trotter,
Defendant/Movant
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-11-0577-PHX-PGR (ECV)
No. CR-05-1135-PHX-PGR
ORDER
15
16
Having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate
17
Judge Voss, filed January 23, 2012, notwithstanding that no party has filed any
18
objections to the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that the Magistrate
19
Judge correctly determined that the movant’s Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside
20
or Correct Sentence, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, must be denied because
21
the movant’s initial § 2255 motion was filed nearly three years after the expiration of
22
the one-year statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C.
23
§ 2255(f) and the movant has not shown that the limitations period should be
24
equitably tolled. Therefore,
25
26
IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
(Doc. 13) is accepted and adopted by the Court.
1
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the movant’s Motion to Amend/Supplement
Record Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c) (Doc. 12) is denied.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the movant’s Amended Motion Under 28
4
U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal
5
Custody (Doc. 4) is denied and that this action is dismissed.
6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to
7
proceed on appeal in forma pauperis are denied because the dismissal of the
8
movant’s § 2255 motion is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason
9
would not find the procedural ruling debatable.
10
DATED this 11th day of April, 2012.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?