Smith v. Valley Radiologists Limited
Filing
9
ORDER finding as moot 6 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint on or before 6/3/2011. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/25/2011.(NVO)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Mona Smith, an individual,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
No. CV11-0599-PHX-DGC
ORDER
vs.
Valley Radiologists Ltd., a corporation,
Defendant.
13
14
Plaintiff filed a complaint asserting discrimination and retaliation in violation of
15
the Americans with Disabilities Act. Doc. 1. On May 2, 2011, Defendant moved to
16
dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim to relief. Doc. 6. Plaintiff, as a matter
17
of course, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B), filed an amended complaint eleven days later.
18
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:
19
1.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 6) is denied as moot.
20
2.
Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(Doc. 7) by June 3, 2011. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3).
Dated this 25th day of May, 2011.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?