Smith v. Valley Radiologists Limited

Filing 9

ORDER finding as moot 6 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint on or before 6/3/2011. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/25/2011.(NVO)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Mona Smith, an individual, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 No. CV11-0599-PHX-DGC ORDER vs. Valley Radiologists Ltd., a corporation, Defendant. 13 14 Plaintiff filed a complaint asserting discrimination and retaliation in violation of 15 the Americans with Disabilities Act. Doc. 1. On May 2, 2011, Defendant moved to 16 dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim to relief. Doc. 6. Plaintiff, as a matter 17 of course, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B), filed an amended complaint eleven days later. 18 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 19 1. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 6) is denied as moot. 20 2. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (Doc. 7) by June 3, 2011. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3). Dated this 25th day of May, 2011.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?