National Labor Relations Board v. Arizona, State of

Filing 28

ORDER GRANTING the parties' 27 stipulation for plaintiff to file a first amended complaint. Plaintiff shall comply with the filing and service requirements of LRCiv 15.1.re 27 . Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 1/13/12. (DMT)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) State of Arizona, ) ) Defendant, ) ) and ) Save Our Secret Ballot; Joyce McClain;) Jose Barraza; R. Scott Brooks, Jr.; Sandra) Brown; Dominic T. Drobeck; Rafael) Barraza; Jamie Franklin; Ahelardo Garcia;) Angelo Granata; Justin Helwig; Jose) Hernandez; Raul Hernandez; Reyes) Inzunza; Derek Kaiser; Enrique Lara, Jr.;) Benny P. Martinez; Gabriel Mendez;) Eleuterio Miguel; Chad A. Mullenax;) Roger S. Myllenbeck; Adalberto Pena) Parra; Tyson Petrie; Jeff Phillips; Shawn) Riegle; Daniel Rusch; David Santellano;) Roy C. Smith; Kelvin L. Steffen; Johnnie) Teller, III; Marco Teran; Steven R.) Tulloss; Israel Vargas; Harvey Wietting;) ) Raeleen Kasinec, ) ) Intervenor-Defendants. ) ) National Labor Relations Board, CV 11-00913-PHX-FJM ORDER 26 The court has before it the parties' joint stipulation for plaintiff to file an amended 27 complaint (doc. 27). A party may amend a pleading, outside of an amendment as a matter 28 1 of course, “only with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave.” Rule 2 15(a)(2), Fed. R. Civ. P. The parties have consented to plaintiff's filing of the first amended 3 complaint. 4 IT IS ORDERED GRANTING the parties' stipulation for plaintiff to file a first 5 amended complaint (doc. 27). Plaintiff shall comply with the filing and service requirements 6 of LRCiv 15.1. 7 DATED this 13th day of January, 2012. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?