Hobson v. Safeway Incorporated et al

Filing 22

ORDER denying 10 Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and denying as moot 12 Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Default. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 9/15/11.(LSP)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 9 10 11 Max M. Hobson, Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. 14 Safeway Inc, Steve A. Burd, President, 15 Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 11-00928-PHX-FJM ORDER 17 18 19 We have before us plaintiff’s application for entry of default as to defendant Steve A. 20 Burd (doc. 10), plaintiff’s affidavit of default (doc. 11), defendant’s motion to set aside 21 default (doc. 12), plaintiff’s response (doc. 13), and defendant’s reply (doc. 15). 22 There is no evidence in the record that defendant Steve Burd was served with a 23 summons in compliance with Rule 4, Fed. R. Civ. P. The plaintiff was informed that 24 Safeway personnel were not authorized to accept service on behalf of any individual (doc. 25 12, ex. A). Therefore, plaintiff’s attempt to serve defendant Steve Burd solely by serving 26 Safeway is ineffective. Defendant Burd is not in default. 27 Accordingly, 28 IT IS ORDERED DENYING plaintiff’s motion for entry of default (doc. 10). 1 2 3 IT IS ORDERED DENYING defendant’s motion to set aside default as moot (doc. 12). DATED this 15th day of September, 2011. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?