Hobson v. Safeway Incorporated et al
ORDER granting Defendants' 57 , 58 Motions to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 1/17/12.(REW)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Max. M. Hobson,
Safeway Inc., et al.,
No. CV 11-00928-PHX-FJM
We have before us defendants' motions to dismiss (docs. 57 and 58). Plaintiff did not
file a response to either motion. Under LRCiv 7.2(i), if an unrepresented party "does not
serve and file the required answering memoranda, . . . such non-compliance may be deemed
a consent to the denial or granting of the motion and the Court may dispose of the motion
summarily." Plaintiff's failure to respond may be deemed a consent to the granting of the
pending motions to dismiss. Any remaining unserved defendants are also dismissed,
pursuant to Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P. and our Order dated November 4, 2011 (doc. 31).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED GRANTING defendants' motions to dismiss (doc.
57 and 58).
DATED this 17th day of January, 2012.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?