Askins v. Smith
Filing
18
ORDER adopting the Report and Recommendation 17 of the Magistrate Judge as the order of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed with prejudice as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 11/4/2011. (KMG)
1
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Dewayne Askins,
Petitioner,
10
11
vs.
12
Dennis R. Smith,
13
Respondent.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV11-0932-PHX-SRB
ORDER
15
16
Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241on
17
May 10, 2011. Respondent filed his answer to Petitioner’s Petition on June 24, 2011. No
18
reply has been filed. On July 15, 2011, Respondent file a Suggestion of Mootness and
19
Petitioner filed a response to the Suggestion of Mootness on July 29, 2011. On October 14,
20
2011, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation recommending that the
21
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed with prejudice as moot.
22
In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they
23
had 14 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within
24
which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has
25
expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.
26
The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the
27
Magistrate Judge.
28
1
2
3
4
5
IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
as the order of this Court. (doc. 17).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed
with prejudice as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.
6
7
DATED this 4th day of November, 2011.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?