Stewart # 137924 v. Unknown Parties et al

Filing 58

ORDER that the Court ACCEPTS the 57 Report and Recommendation. The 47 Motion is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 9/18/2013. (LFIG)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jenghiz K. Stewart,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Medical Review Committee, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:11-cv-00997 JWS - JFM
ORDER FROM CHAMBERS
[Re: Report and Recommendation
at doc. 57; Dismissal of Case]

I. MATTER PRESENTED
At docket 57, Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf filed a report recommending
that the court grant defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute and dismiss
this action with prejudice [docket 47]. The time for filing objections has run, and no
objections have been filed.
II. STANDARD OF REVIEW
The district court may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings
or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.”1 When reviewing a magistrate
judge’s report and recommendation, the district court reviews de novo conclusions of

1

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

law2 and findings of fact to which parties object.3 The court reviews for clear error
uncontested findings of fact.4
III. CONCLUSION
Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation under the
standard of review articulated above, the court agrees with the magistrate judge’s
findings of fact and conclusions of law. Accordingly, the court ACCEPTS the report and
recommendation at docket 57. The motion at docket 47 is GRANTED, and this case is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.
DATED this 18th day of September 2013.

/S/
JOHN W. SEDWICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Barilla v. Ervin, 886 F.3d 1514, 1518 (9th Cir. 1989), overruled on other grounds by
Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corp., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174 (9th Cir. 1996).
3

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

4

Taberer v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 954 F.2d 888, 906 (3d Cir. 1992).

-2-