Faulkner v. Bank of New York Mellon et al

Filing 14

ORDER, Plaintiffs shall file a Response to Defendants' 11 MOTION to Dismiss on or before 8/19/11. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/12/11. (REW)

Download PDF
    1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Jeremy and Valerie Faulkner, No. CV11-1070-PHX-DGC Plaintiffs, 10 ORDER 11 vs. 12 Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a Bank of New York, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 Defendants Bank of New York Mellon, First Tennessee Bank National 17 Association, and Metlife Bank, N.A. move to dismiss the amended complaint. Doc. 11. 18 Local Rule 7.2(c) requires a party opposing a motion to dismiss to file a response within 19 fourteen (14) days after service of the motion. The motion here was filed on July 14, and 20 Defendants certify that service by mail to Plaintiffs occurred on the same day. Doc. 11 at 21 18. 22 response. Plaintiffs pro se in this action challenging foreclosure have not filed a timely 23 Plaintiffs shall file a response to the motion to dismiss by August 19, 2011. 24 Failure to do so will result in a summary grant of the motion and dismissal of the claims 25 against Defendants pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(i). 26 Plaintiffs are advised that they must become familiar with, and follow, the Federal 27 Rules of Civil Procedure (available online at http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/) and 28 the Rules of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona (“Local Rules”)     1 (which 2 http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/azd/courtinfo.nsf/local+rules+2004?openview). 3 4 5 may be obtained in the Clerk of Court’s office or online at IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file a response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss on or before August 19, 2011. Dated this 12th day of August, 2011. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ‐ 2 ‐ 

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?