Seaton v. Astrue
Filing
36
ORDER granting 34 Plaintiff's Attorney's Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees in the amount of $31,574.79. Defendant shall refund to plaintiff the remainder, if any, of any past due benefits withheld for potential attorney's fees. See order for additional details. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 6/29/2016.(LMR)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Allen Gene Seaton,
Plaintiff,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-11-01143-PHX-FJM
Carolyn W. Colvin,
13
Defendant.
14
15
The court has before it Plaintiff's Attorney's Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees
16
17
under 42 U.S.C. Section 406(b) (Doc. 34) and the Defendant's Response (Doc. 35),
18
indicating that it has no objection to the motion.
19
Counsel has a contingent fee agreement with plaintiff for 25% of all past due
20
benefits awarded. Although counsel did not seek fees under the fee shifting provisions of
21
28 U.S.C. Section 2412, his petition is framed with an offset for the fees that might have
22
been awarded.
Cross checking the contingent fee against the load star suggests that the multiplier
23
24
for the contingent nature is not unreasonable. Accordingly, it is ORDERED GRANTING
25
Plaintiff's Attorney's Motion for an award of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. Section
26
406(b) in the amount of $31,574.79. (Doc. 34). It is further ORDERED that the
27
//
28
1
2
3
defendant shall refund to plaintiff the remainder, if any, of any past due benefits withheld
for potential attorney's fees.
Dated this 29th day of June, 2016.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?