Osuna v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP et al
Filing
26
ORDER that the 24 Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 23 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/15/2012.(LFIG)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
No. CV-11-01147-PHX-GMS
Oscar Osuna
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
ORDER
Bank of America, a/k/a BOA Home Loans
Servicing, L.P.; ReconTrust Company,
N.A. as Trustee, et al.,
12
13
Defendants.
14
15
Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants
16
Bank of America, N.A. and ReconTrust Company, N.A. (“Defendants”). (Doc. 23.) Also
17
pending is Plaintiff Oscar Osuna’s Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice. (Doc. 24.) For
18
the reasons discussed below, Osuna’s motion is granted and Defendants’ motion is
19
denied as moot.
20
Osuna filed suit in state court in May 2011 asserting a variety of claims against
21
Defendants in connection with a loan that he claims he does not owe to Defendants on his
22
home. (Doc. 1-1.) Defendants removed this action to federal court and on December 13,
23
2011, this Court dismissed all of Osuna’s claims except Count 4, the action to quiet title.
24
(Doc. 9 at 9.)
25
Defendants proceeded to serve interrogatories and requests for production of
26
documents on Osuna, but Osuna apparently never responded. (Doc. 23 at 2 n.1.)
27
Defendants then filed their Motion for Summary Judgment. Osuna did not respond to this
28
motion, but instead filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice. Osuna laid
1
out no reasons for his request to dismiss the case. Because Defendants have already filed
2
an Answer in this case, (Doc. 13), Osuna’s Notice is construed as a Rule 41(a)(2) motion
3
for voluntary dismissal. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2) (requiring the plaintiff to obtain the
4
court’s permission before dismissing an action if an answer or motion for summary
5
judgment has been filed).
6
A district court should grant a Rule 41(a)(2) motion for voluntary dismissal unless
7
defendant has made a showing that it will suffer some plain legal prejudice as a result.
8
Smith v. Lenches, 263 F.3d 972, 975 (9th Cir. 2001). Legal prejudice means “prejudice to
9
some legal interest, some legal claim, some legal argument.” Id. at 976. “Uncertainty
10
because a dispute remains unresolved” or “the threat of future litigation” do not constitute
11
plain legal prejudice. Id. Nor is plain legal prejudice established by a showing that the
12
defendant has already begun trial preparations. Hamilton v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.,
13
Inc., 679 F.2d 143, 145–46 (9th Cir. 1982). Furthermore, “the mere inconvenience of
14
defending another lawsuit does not constitute plain legal prejudice.” Id.
15
Defendants argue that Osuna’s motion for voluntary dismissal should be denied
16
because his lawsuit is frivolous. They also argue that Osuna “should not be permitted to
17
hold the threat of future litigation over Defendants.”
18
The Ninth Circuit has expressly stated that the threat of future litigation is not a
19
ground for prejudice that warrants denial of a Rule 41(a)(2) motion for voluntary
20
dismissal. Defendants have made no other arguments that Osuna’s voluntary dismissal
21
will cause them legal prejudice. As such, Osuna’s motion for voluntary dismissal is
22
granted.
23
Because Defendants will not suffer plain legal prejudice, Osuna’s Motion to
24
Dismiss without Prejudice is granted. Because the case will be dismissed, Defendants’
25
Motion for Summary Judgment is denied as moot.
26
27
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice
of Oscar Osuna (Doc. 24) is GRANTED.
28
-2-
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment of
2
Defendants Bank of America, N.A. and ReconTrust Company, N.A. (Doc. 23) is
3
DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action.
4
Dated this 15th day of October, 2012.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?