Howard v. Astrue

Filing 25

ORDER re 24 Mandate - Back in 2012, we affirmed the decision of the Commissioner denying disability benefits. Order of Oct. 4, 2012 (doc. 18 ). We now have before us the Mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit requiri ng us to remand this case to the Commissioner for the computation of benefits. Mandate of Apr. 21, 2015 at 3. (Doc. 24-1 at 3). Accordingly, pursuant to the circuit's order, it is ORDERED remanding this case to the Commissioner for the computation of benefits. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 4/24/15. (LAD)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Cynthia Howard, Plaintiff, 10 11 vs. 12 Michael J. Astrue, 13 Defendant. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 11-1216-PHX-FJM ORDER 15 16 17 Back in 2012, we affirmed the decision of the Commissioner denying disability 18 benefits. Order of Oct. 4, 2012 (doc. 18). We now have before us the Mandate of the United 19 States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit requiring us to remand this case to the 20 Commissioner for “the computation of benefits.” Mandate of Apr. 21, 2015 at 3. (Doc. 24-1 21 at 3). Accordingly, pursuant to the circuit’s order, it is ORDERED remanding this case to 22 the Commissioner for the computation of benefits. 23 DATED this 24th day of April, 2015. 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?