Howard v. Astrue

Filing 25

ORDER re 24 Mandate - Back in 2012, we affirmed the decision of the Commissioner denying disability benefits. Order of Oct. 4, 2012 (doc. 18 ). We now have before us the Mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit requiri ng us to remand this case to the Commissioner for the computation of benefits. Mandate of Apr. 21, 2015 at 3. (Doc. 24-1 at 3). Accordingly, pursuant to the circuit's order, it is ORDERED remanding this case to the Commissioner for the computation of benefits. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 4/24/15. (LAD)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Cynthia Howard,
Plaintiff,

10
11

vs.

12
Michael J. Astrue,
13
Defendant.
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV 11-1216-PHX-FJM
ORDER

15
16
17

Back in 2012, we affirmed the decision of the Commissioner denying disability

18

benefits. Order of Oct. 4, 2012 (doc. 18). We now have before us the Mandate of the United

19

States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit requiring us to remand this case to the

20

Commissioner for “the computation of benefits.” Mandate of Apr. 21, 2015 at 3. (Doc. 24-1

21

at 3). Accordingly, pursuant to the circuit’s order, it is ORDERED remanding this case to

22

the Commissioner for the computation of benefits.

23

DATED this 24th day of April, 2015.

24
25
26
27
28