Sanchez v. Schroeder et al
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The 12 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted; the Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 with prejudice; the Clerk shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 12/16/11. (REW)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Rene Orivel Sanchez,
10
Petitioner,
11
v.
12
Therese Schroeder, et al.,
13
Respondents.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 11-01237-PHX-NVW (MEA)
ORDER
15
Pending before the court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate
16
Judge Aspey (Doc. 12) regarding Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed
17
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1). The R&R recommends that the Petition be denied
18
and dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had
19
fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (Doc. 12 at 15 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)).
20
Plaintiff requested an additional ninety days to file an objection to the R&R (Doc. 13), which
21
the Court granted (Doc. 14). However, no objections were filed.
22
Because the parties did not file objections, the court need not review any of the
23
Magistrate Judge’s determinations on dispositive matters. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);
24
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003);
25
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any
26
review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.”). The absence of a
27
timely objection also means that error may not be assigned on appeal to any defect in the
28
rulings of the Magistrate Judge on any non-dispositive matters. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) (“A
1
party may serve and file objections to the order within 14 days after being served with a copy
2
[of the magistrate’s order]. A party may not assign as error a defect in the order not timely
3
objected to.”); Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corp., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174 (9th Cir. 1996); Philipps
4
v. GMC, 289 F.3d 1117, 1120-21 (9th Cir. 2002).
5
Notwithstanding the absence of an objection, the court has reviewed the R&R and
6
finds that it is well taken. The court will accept the R&R and dismiss the Petition. See 28
7
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or
8
in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”).
9
10
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge (Doc. 12) is accepted.
11
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment dismissing
12
Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1)
13
with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action.
14
DATED this 16th day of December, 2011.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?