Bertanelli v. Ryan et al

Filing 85

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 63 and 70 Objections. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 10/1/2012.(LFIG)

1

WO

2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Jonathon C. Bertanelli,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
)
)
Respondents.
)
___________________________ )

CV 11-1346-PHX-PGR (BSB)
ORDER

14
15

Currently before the Court are Plaintiff’s “Emergency Objection to Magistrate Denial

16

of Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending Petition for Certiorari Review”

17

(Doc. 63) and “Plaintiff’s Objection to Magistrate Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to

18

Voluntarily Withdraw Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and Refile and Plaintiff’s Motion

19

for Leave to File First Amended Complaint” (Doc. 70). Defendants oppose the motions.

20

(Docs. 68, 72.)

21

Plaintiff has not shown that the magistrate judge’s orders (Docs. 57, 64) denying

22

Plaintiff’s motions were clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). In

23

both instances, the magistrate judge correctly determined that the relief requested by Plaintiff

24

was unwarranted.

25

Accordingly,

26

IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s “Objections” (Docs. 63, 70).

27

DATED this 1st day of October, 2012.

28