ARCUS Equity II LLC v. Mission Capital Advisors LLC et al
Filing
13
ORDER that this action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 9/19/11. (TLJ)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
10
Arcus Equity II, LLC,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
vs.
Mission Capital Advisors, Inc., et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-11-1453-PHX-PGR
ORDER
15
16
On August 30, 2011, the Court entered an order (Doc.11) that dismissed
17
the complaint in this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to the
18
plaintiff’s failure to properly allege the existence of diversity of citizenship
19
jurisdiction, required the plaintiff to file an amended complaint no later than
20
September 12, 2011 that cured the deficient jurisdictional allegations, and
21
advised the plaintiff that this action would be dismissed for lack of subject matter
22
jurisdiction if the required amended complaint was not timely filed. On
23
September 15, 2011, the plaintiff, instead of filing a notice of voluntary dismissal
24
pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), filed a Notice of Intention Not to Submit
25
Amended Complaint (doc. 12) wherein it states that it has elected not to file an
26
amended complaint and that it was reserving its right to commence a separate
1
2
3
4
action against the defendants in the future. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.
DATED this 19th day of September, 2011.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?