Mansanares v. Arizona, State of et al

Filing 5

ORDER that Plaintiff's 2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. The Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compl iance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 08/31/11. (ESL)

Download PDF
1 WO SC 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Miguel Mansanares, 9 Plaintiff, 10 vs. 11 State of Arizona, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 11-1521-PHX-JAT (LOA) ORDER 14 Plaintiff Miguel Mansanares, who is confined in Maricopa County’s Fourth Avenue 15 Jail in Phoenix, Arizona, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 16 § 1983 and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Court will dismiss the 17 Complaint with leave to amend. 18 I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee 19 Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. 20 § 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 21 The Court will not assess an initial partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The statutory 22 fee will be collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income each time 23 the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a 24 separate Order requiring the appropriate government agency to collect and forward the fees 25 according to the statutory formula. 26 II. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints 27 28 JDDL-K The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 1 § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised 2 claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may 3 be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 4 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). 5 A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the 6 pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 does not 7 demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant- 8 unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009). 9 “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory 10 statements, do not suffice.” Id. 11 “[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a 12 claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 13 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual content 14 that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the 15 misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for 16 relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial 17 experience and common sense.” Id. at 1950. Thus, although a plaintiff’s specific factual 18 allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must assess whether there 19 are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id. at 1951. 20 But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, courts 21 must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th 22 Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less stringent standards 23 than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 24 94 (2007) (per curiam)). 25 26 a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal of the 27 action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The Court 28 JDDL-K If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts, should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type of advice “would -2- 1 undermine district judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 2 231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to decide whether the court was 3 required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). The Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint 4 for failure to state a claim and to comply with the Rule 8 and the Instructions for completing 5 the court-approved form complaint. But because the Complaint may possibly be saved by 6 amendment, the Complaint will be dismissed with leave to amend. 7 III. Complaint 8 Plaintiff alleges ten counts for relief for violations of his due process and equal 9 protection rights, denial of access to the courts, threats to safety, denial of counsel, violation 10 of double jeopardy, violation of the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA), Fifth Amendment 11 right not to incriminate himself, involuntary servitude, and denial of compulsory process. 12 Plaintiff sues the State of Arizona, the Superior Court, County Attorneys, and Jane and John 13 Does. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief. 14 Background 15 Plaintiff is currently detained pending criminal proceedings in Maricopa County 16 Superior Court in the following cases: CR2011-005824, CR2011-005833, and CR2011- 17 005839. On May 19, 2011, the Maricopa County Superior Court ordered a full Rule 11 18 competency evaluation.1 On August 11, 2011, the court continued a Rule 11 competency 19 hearing until September 15, 2011 and sanctioned Plaintiff 30 days in jail for contempt based 20 on his refusal to cooperate in competency evaluations.2 21 IV. Failure to Comply with Instructions 22 Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that an incarcerated person 23 must file a complaint on the court-approved form. The form must be completely filled into 24 the extent applicable with all questions answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate 25 26 27 28 JDDL-K 1 See http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/052011/m4732627.pdf (last visited Aug. 29, 2011). 2 See http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/082011/m4852942.pdf (last visited Aug. 29, 2011). -3- 1 space on the form. The Instructions for completing the court-approved form complaint 2 provide as follows: 3 4 5 6 7 Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 (Instructions at ¶ 1) (italics added). Further, the Instructions provide: 1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation of only one civil right per count. 2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,” you must identify the specific issue involved. 3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s) occurred, if possible. 4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights. 16 17 (Id., part C) (italics added). 18 Plaintiff used the court-approved form for his Complaint, but he failed to comply with 19 the Instructions for completing the form complaint. Plaintiff asserted multiple constitutional 20 violations in each count. Plaintiff also failed to provide the information requested in the 21 appropriate place on the court-approved form complaint. Further, he failed to concisely set 22 forth facts to support how any particular Defendant violated his federal constitutional or 23 statutory rights, including when, where, and how. These failures render the Complaint 24 rambling, vague, conclusory, and confusing. 25 26 the court-approved form, his Complaint will be dismissed with leave to amend. In a first 27 amended complaint, Plaintiff should carefully follow the Instructions by setting forth only 28 JDDL-K As a consequence of Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Instructions for completing one constitutional violation in each count, concisely describe the facts that support how, -4- 1 when, and where a particular defendant violated the federal constitutional or statutory right 2 at issue in that count. Plaintiff should repeat this process for each count. Plaintiff should not 3 exceed the page limit in his amended complaint. 4 V. Failure to State a Claim 5 To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege facts supporting that (1) the 6 conduct about which he complains was committed by a person acting under the color of state 7 law and (2) the conduct deprived him of a federal constitutional or statutory right. Wood v. 8 Ostrander, 879 F.2d 583, 587 (9th Cir. 1989). In addition, a plaintiff must allege that he 9 suffered a specific injury as a result of the conduct of a particular defendant and he must 10 allege an affirmative link between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. Rizzo v. 11 Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976). 12 Further, to state a claim against a particular individual defendant, a “plaintiff must 13 allege facts, not simply conclusions, that show that [the] individual was personally involved 14 in the deprivation of his civil rights.” Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 15 1998). For an individual to be liable in his official capacity, a plaintiff must allege that the 16 official acted as a result of a policy, practice, or custom. See Cortez v. County of Los 17 Angeles, 294 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2001). In addition, there is no respondeat superior 18 liability under § 1983, so a defendant’s position as the supervisor of someone who allegedly 19 violated a plaintiff’s constitutional rights does not make him liable. Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. 20 Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978); Taylor, 880 F.2d at 1045. A supervisor in his individual 21 capacity, “is only liable for constitutional violations of his subordinates if the supervisor 22 participated in or directed the violations, or knew of the violations and failed to act to prevent 23 them.” Taylor, 880 F.2d at 1045. 24 As discussed below, Plaintiff has only sued entities or persons that cannot be sued 25 under § 1983 or that are entitled to immunity. For that reason, Plaintiff fails to state a viable 26 claim under § 1983 against any of the named Defendants. 27 28 JDDL-K A. State of Arizona Plaintiff names the State of Arizona as a Defendant. Under the Eleventh Amendment -5- 1 to the Constitution of the United States, neither a state nor a state agency may be sued in 2 federal court without its consent. Pennhurst St. Sch. & Hosp., 465 U.S. 89, 100 (1984); 3 Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989). Arizona has not manifested the intention 4 to waive its sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment from suit in federal court. 5 Accordingly, the State of Arizona will be dismissed from this action. 6 B. [Maricopa County] Superior Court 7 Plaintiff purports to sue the Maricopa County Superior Court. “A state court is not 8 a ‘person’ for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and hence is not subject to lawsuit under that 9 statute.” Mumford v. Basinski, 105 F.3d 264, 267 (6th Cir. 1997); see also, Mumford v. 10 Zieba, 4 F.3d 429, 435 (6th Cir. 1997) (citing Foster v. Walsh, 864 F.2d 416, 418 (6th Cir. 11 1988)); Clark v. Clark, 984 F.2d 272, 273 (8th Cir. 1993); Rothstein v. Montana Supreme 12 Court, 638 F.Supp. 1311, 1312 (D. Mont. 1986); Louis v. Supreme Court of Nevada, 490 13 F.Supp. 1174, 1180 (D.Nev. 1980) (as a state is not a “person” within the meaning of § 1983, 14 neither is the state’s supreme court a “person” under the statute). Accordingly, the Superior 15 Court will be dismissed as a Defendant. 16 Although not named as Defendants, Plaintiff includes allegations against Maricopa 17 County Superior Court judges and commissioners in his Complaint. Judges are absolutely 18 immune from damages for all judicial acts performed within their subject matter jurisdiction, 19 “even when such acts are in excess of their jurisdiction, and are alleged to have been done 20 maliciously or corruptly.” Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 356 (1978); Sadoski v. 21 Mosley, 435 F.3d 1076, 1079 (9th Cir. 2006); Harvey v. Waldron, 210 F.3d 1008, 1012 (9th 22 Cir. 2000). An act is “judicial” when it is a function normally performed by a judge and the 23 parties dealt with the judge in the judge’s judicial capacity. Stump, 435 U.S. at 362; Crooks 24 v. Maynard, 913 F.2d 699, 700 (9th Cir. 1990). Such immunity also “extends to actions for 25 declaratory, injunctive and other equitable relief.” Mullis v. Bankruptcy Court for the Dist. 26 of Nev., 828 F.2d 1385, 1394 (9th Cir. 1987). Cf. Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522, 541-42 27 (1984) (state officials have judicial or quasi-judicial immunity from damages only). 28 JDDL-K In his Complaint, Plaintiff seeks relief against court commissioners and judges solely -6- 1 based upon rulings in his criminal cases. As discussed above, the commissioners and judges 2 are entitled to absolute immunity for their actions in connection with his criminal 3 proceedings. Accordingly, to the extent that Plaintiff seeks relief against Maricopa County 4 judicial officers in his Complaint, he fails to state a claim. 5 C. [Maricopa County] Attorneys 6 Plaintiff sues Maricopa County Attorneys and, although not named as Defendants, 7 includes allegations against particular prosecutors involved in his criminal proceedings. A 8 prosecutor is absolutely immune from liability under § 1983 for his conduct in “initiating a 9 prosecution and in presenting the State’s case” insofar as that conduct is “intimately 10 associated with the judicial phase of the criminal process.” Buckley v. Fitzsimmons, 509 11 U.S. 259, 270 (1993) (citing Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 430 (1976)); Burns v. Reed, 12 500 U.S. 478, 486 (1991) (quoting Imbler, 424 U.S. at 430-431); Ashelman v. Pope, 793 13 F.2d 1072, 1076 (9th Cir. 1986). Immunity also extends to a prosecutor “eliciting false or 14 defamatory testimony from witnesses” or for making false or defamatory statements during, 15 and related to judicial proceedings. Buckley, 509 U.S. 259, 270 (1993) (citations omitted). 16 Because Plaintiff only seeks relief against Maricopa County prosecutors for actions in 17 prosecuting the criminal cases against him, these attorneys are entitled prosecutorial 18 immunity and will be dismissed. 19 20 Although not named as Defendants, Plaintiff also includes numerous allegations 21 against the criminal defense counsel who have represented him in his criminal proceedings. 22 A prerequisite for any relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are allegations to support that a 23 defendant has acted under the color of state law. Whether an attorney representing a criminal 24 defendant is privately retained, a public defender, or court-appointed counsel, he does not act 25 under color of state law. See Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 317-18 (1981); Miranda 26 v. Clark County, Nevada, 319 F.3d 465, 468 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Accordingly, to the 27 extent that Plaintiff asserts allegations against his defense counsel, he fails to state a claim 28 JDDL-K D. Defense Counsel under § 1983 and these allegations will be dismissed. -7- 1 E. Jane and John Does 2 Plaintiff sues an unspecified number of Doe Defendants without alleging how any 3 Doe Defendant violated his constitutional rights. Rule 10(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil 4 Procedure requires a plaintiff to include the names of the parties to an action. As a practical 5 matter, it is impossible in most instances for the United States Marshal or his designee to 6 serve a summons and complaint on an anonymous defendant. 7 The Ninth Circuit has held that where identity is unknown prior to the filing of a 8 complaint, the plaintiff should be given an opportunity through discovery to identify the 9 unknown defendants, unless it is clear that discovery would not uncover the identities, or that 10 the complaint would be dismissed on other grounds. Wakefield v. Thompson, 177 F.3d 11 1160, 1163 (9th Cir. 1999) (citing Gillespie v. Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 1980)). 12 Further, where the names of individual defendants are unknown at the time a complaint is 13 filed, a plaintiff may refer to the individual unknown defendants as Defendant John Doe 1, 14 John Doe 2, John Doe 3, and so on, and allege facts to support how each particular Doe 15 defendant violated the plaintiff’s constitutional rights. The plaintiff may thereafter use the 16 discovery processes to obtain the names of fictitiously-named defendants whom he believes 17 violated his constitutional rights and seek leave to amend to name those defendants. 18 VI. Leave to Amend 19 For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state 20 a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a first 21 amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will mail 22 Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails 23 to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended complaint and dismiss this 24 action without further notice to Plaintiff. 25 26 Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its 27 entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original 28 JDDL-K Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count. -8- 1 A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 2 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 3 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original complaint as 4 nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original 5 complaint is waived if it is not raised in a first amended complaint. King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 6 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987). 7 VII. Warnings 8 A. Release 9 Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release. 10 Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay 11 the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result 12 in dismissal of this action. 13 B. Address Changes 14 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 15 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other 16 relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this 17 action. 18 C. Copies 19 Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See 20 LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice 21 to Plaintiff. 22 23 Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff fails 24 to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the 25 dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 26 Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil 27 judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior 28 JDDL-K D. Possible “Strike” occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a -9- 1 court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, 2 or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under 3 imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 4 E. Possible Dismissal 5 If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these 6 warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 7 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the 8 Court). 9 IT IS ORDERED: 10 (1) Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. (Doc. 2.) 11 (2) As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, 12 13 Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is not assessed an initial partial filing fee. (3) The Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff has 14 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with 15 this Order. 16 (4) If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of 17 Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice 18 that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 19 20 21 (5) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. DATED this 31st day of August, 2011. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JDDL-K - 10 - Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona 1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment. 2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law. 3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury. 4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $350.00. If you are unable to immediately pay the filing fee, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the “Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions. 5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten. 6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $350 filing fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to: Revised 3/9/07 1 Phoenix & Prescott Divisions: OR U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130 401 West Washington Street, SPC 10 Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119 Tucson Division: U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500 405 West Congress Street Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010 7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case. 8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis). Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form: I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed this (month, day, year) to: Name: Address: Attorney for Defendant(s) (Signature) 9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint, you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the courtapproved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave (permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv 15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time. 10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint. Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial. 11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written pleading or motion. 2 12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form. HEADING: 1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing address on the lines provided. 2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line, write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1A” at the bottom. 3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED” in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are seeking only injunctive relief. Part A. JURISDICTION: 1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of that authority. 2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights occurred. 3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,” “2-B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2. Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS: You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2. Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION: You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page 5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages. 3 1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation of only one civil right per count. 2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,” you must identify the specific issue involved. 3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s) occurred, if possible. 4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights. 5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided. Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF: Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided. SIGNATURE: You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself. FINAL NOTE You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number the pages. 4 Name and Prisoner/Booking Number Place of Confinement Mailing Address City, State, Zip Code (Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA (Full Name of Plaintiff) Plaintiff, vs. (1) (Full Name of Defendant) (2) (3) (4) Defendant(s). G Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them. ) , ) ) ) ) CASE NO. ) (To be supplied by the Clerk) , ) ) , ) CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT ) , ) BY A PRISONER ) , ) G Original Complaint G First Amended Complaint ) ) G Second Amended Complaint A. JURISDICTION 1. 2. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to: G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983 G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). G Other: . Institution/city where violation occurred: . Revised 3/9/07 1 550/555 B. DEFENDANTS 1. Name of first Defendant: at . The first Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) 2. (Institution) Name of second Defendant: at . The second Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) 3. (Institution) Name of third Defendant: at . The third Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) 4. (Institution) Name of fourth Defendant: at . The fourth Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) (Institution) If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page. C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS 1. Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner? 2. If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed? G Yes G No . Describe the previous lawsuits: a. First prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . b. Second prior lawsuit: v. 1. Parties: 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . c. Third prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page. 2 D. CAUSE OF ACTION 1. COUNT I State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies: a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available G Yes G No at your institution? b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . 3 1. COUNT II State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies. a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your institution? G Yes G No b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . 4 1. COUNT III State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies. a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available G Yes G No at your institution? b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page. 5 E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF State the relief you are seeking: . I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on DATE SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF (Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or other person who helped prepare this complaint) (Signature of attorney, if any) (Attorney’s address & telephone number) ADDITIONAL PAGES All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?