Dehar v. Diaz et al

Filing 6

ORDER granting 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 5 Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief. The Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is f iled to file a first amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a strike under 28:1915(g). The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 10/16/11.(TLJ)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9
10

Donald Cory Dehar,

11

Plaintiff,

12

vs.

13

Warden Diaz, et al.,
Defendants.

14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV 11-1735-PHX-RCB (MHB)
ORDER

15
16

Plaintiff Donald Cory Dehar, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison Complex,

17

Barchey Unit, in Buckeye, Arizona, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42

18

U.S.C. § 1983 and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Doc. 1, 2.) Plaintiff has

19

also filed a motion for emergency relief, which the Court construes as a motion for injunctive

20

relief. (Doc. 5.) The Court will dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend and deny the

21

motion.

22

I.

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee

23
24

§ 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).

25

The Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of $25.38. The remainder of the fee will be

26

collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income each time the amount

27

in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a separate

28
JDDL-K

Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C.

Order requiring the appropriate government agency to collect and forward the fees according

1

to the statutory formula.

2

II.

Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints

3

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against

4

a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.

5

§ 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised

6

claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may

7

be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.

8

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).

9

A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the

10

pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 does not

11

demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant-

12

unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009).

13

“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory

14

statements, do not suffice.” Id.

15

“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a

16

claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,

17

550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual content

18

that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the

19

misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for

20

relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial

21

experience and common sense.” Id. at 1950. Thus, although a plaintiff’s specific factual

22

allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must assess whether there

23

are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id. at 1951.

24
25

must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th

26

Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less stringent standards

27

than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89,

28
JDDL-K

But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, courts

94 (2007) (per curiam)).
-2-

1

If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts,

2

a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal of the

3

action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The Court

4

should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type of advice “would

5

undermine district judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225,

6

231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to decide whether the court was

7

required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). The Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint

8

for failure to state a claim, but because the Complaint may possibly be saved by amendment,

9

the Court will grant Plaintiff leave to amend.

10

III.

Complaint

11

Plaintiff alleges three claims for threat to safety, denial of constitutionally adequate

12

medical care, and retaliation. Plaintiff sues Arizona Governor Janice Brewer and the

13

following employees of the Arizona Department of Corrections (ADC): Director Charles

14

Ryan; Warden Diaz; and Deputy Warden Perkins. Plaintiff seeks injunctive, compensatory,

15

and punitive relief.

16

Plaintiff alleges the following facts: On April 18, 2011, he was subject to controlled

17

movement for a visit to the dentist when another inmate struck him in the head with a

18

padlock tied to a torn sheet. Plaintiff was also kicked multiple times in the face, neck, head,

19

and back. No officers were supervising Plaintiff’s controlled movement at the time, contrary

20

to prison policy. Plaintiff suffered a concussion and severe head and neck injuries, which

21

have continued since that time. According to Plaintiff, the assault was captured on videotape

22

and shows that no officers were present.

23
24

follows: his property was seized and later lost, money in his inmate account was removed,

25

his out-going mail was held temporarily, he was denied out-going calls, and his inmate

26

request forms to seek replacement of his property were ignored. In addition, “some guards”

27

told other inmates that Plaintiff was gay, although he is not.

28
JDDL-K

Plaintiff further alleges retaliation for seeking medical care after he was attacked as

/

/

/
-3-

1

IV.

Failure to State a Claim

2

Section 1983 provides a cause of action against persons acting under color of state law

3

who have violated rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and federal law. 42

4

U.S.C. § 1983; see also Buckley v. City of Redding, 66 F.3d 188, 190 (9th Cir. 1995). To

5

state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege facts supporting that (1) the conduct about

6

which he complains was committed by a person acting under the color of state law and (2)

7

the conduct deprived him of a federal constitutional or statutory right. Wood v. Ostrander,

8

879 F.2d 583, 587 (9th Cir. 1989). A “‘plaintiff generally must assert his own legal rights

9

and interests, and cannot assert the legal rights or interests of third parties.’” Mothershed v.

10

Justices of the Supreme Court, 410 F.3d 602, 610 (9th Cir. 2005) (quoting Warth v. Seldin,

11

422 U.S. 490, 499 (1975)). A plaintiff must also allege that he suffered a specific injury as

12

a result of the conduct of a particular defendant and he must allege an affirmative link

13

between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72,

14

377 (1976).

15
16

conclusions, that show that an individual was personally involved in the deprivation of his

17

civil rights.” Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998). For an individual

18

to be liable in his official capacity, a plaintiff must allege that the official acted as a result of

19

a policy, practice, or custom or that the official promulgated a policy, practice or custom

20

resulting in the violation. See Cortez v. County of Los Angeles, 294 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th

21

Cir. 2001). In addition, there is no respondeat superior liability under § 1983, so a

22

defendant’s position as the supervisor of someone who allegedly violated a plaintiff’s

23

constitutional rights does not make him liable. Monell v. Dep’t of Soc.Servs., 436 U.S. 658,

24

691 (1978); Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989). A supervisor in his

25

individual capacity, “is only liable for constitutional violations of his subordinates if the

26

supervisor participated in or directed the violations, or knew of the violations and failed to

27

act to prevent them.” Taylor, 880 F.2d at 1045. Moreover, where a defendant’s only

28
JDDL-K

Further, to state a claim against a defendant, a “plaintiff must allege facts, not simply

involvement in allegedly unconstitutional conduct is the denial of administrative grievances,
-4-

1

the failure to intervene on a prisoner’s behalf to remedy the alleged unconstitutional behavior

2

does not amount to active unconstitutional behavior for purposes of § 1983. Shehee v.

3

Luttrell, 199 F.3d 295, 300 (6th Cir. 1999); accord Mintun v. Blades, No. CV-06-139-BLW,

4

2008 WL 711636, at *7 (D. Idaho Mar. 14, 2008); Stocker v. Warden, No. 1:07-CV-

5

00589LJODLBP, 2009 WL 981323, at *10 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2009).

6

A.

7

Plaintiff sues Arizona Governor Brewer, Director Ryan and DW Perkins. Plaintiff

8

alleges that Ryan was to blame for the absence of officers to escort him when he was

9

attacked. Plaintiff only alleges that Perkins was the Deputy Warden of Stiner Unit and he

10

Brewer, Ryan, and Perkins

includes no factual allegations against Brewer.

11

Plaintiff alleges no facts against Perkins or Brewer, and thus, fails to state a claim

12

against either. Plaintiff predicates his claim against each Ryan on respondent superior. As

13

noted above, respondeat superior does not afford a basis for liability under § 1983. Because

14

Plaintiff fails to state a viable constitutional claim against Perkins, Brewer, or Ryan, they will

15

be dismissed.

16

B.

Threat to Safety

17

Plaintiff designates Count I as a claim for threat to safety or failure to protect. To

18

state a claim under § 1983 for failure to protect or threats to safety, an inmate must allege

19

facts to support that he was incarcerated under conditions posing a substantial risk of harm

20

and that prison officials were “deliberately indifferent” to those risks. Farmer v. Brennan,

21

511 U.S. 825, 832-33 (1994). To adequately allege deliberate indifference, a plaintiff must

22

allege facts to support that a defendant knew of, but disregarded, an excessive risk to inmate

23

safety. Id. at 837. That is, “the official must both [have been] aware of facts from which the

24

inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exist[ed], and he must also

25

[have] draw[n] the inference.” Id.

26
27

know that the attacking inmate posed a threat to Plaintiff. Plaintiff also does not allege facts

28
JDDL-K

Plaintiff has not alleged facts to support that any Defendant knew or had reason to

to support that he was incarcerated under conditions posing a substantial risk of harm to him.
-5-

1

For example, Plaintiff does not allege that any Defendant knew that the inmate who attacked

2

Plaintiff had threatened him previous to the attack. Mere failure to comply with prison

3

procedures, absent more, does not rise to the level of a constitutional violation. Accordingly,

4

Plaintiff fails to state a claim for threat to safety or failure to protect and Count I will be

5

dismissed.

6

C.

Medical Care

7

Plaintiff designates Count II as a claim for denial of constitutionally adequate medical

8

care. Not every claim by a prisoner relating to inadequate medical treatment states a

9

violation of the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment. To state a § 1983 medical claim, a

10

plaintiff must show that the defendants acted with “deliberate indifference to serious medical

11

needs.” Jett v. Penner, 439 F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429

12

U.S. 97, 104 (1976)). A plaintiff must show (1) a “serious medical need” by demonstrating

13

that failure to treat the condition could result in further significant injury or the unnecessary

14

and wanton infliction of pain and (2) the defendant’s response was deliberately indifferent.

15

Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096 (quotations omitted).

16

“Deliberate indifference is a high legal standard.” Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051,

17

1060 (9th Cir. 2004). To act with deliberate indifference, a prison official must both know

18

of and disregard an excessive risk to inmate health; “the official must both be aware of facts

19

from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and

20

he must also draw the inference.” Farmer, 511 U.S. at 837. Deliberate indifference in the

21

medical context may be shown by a purposeful act or failure to respond to a prisoner’s pain

22

or possible medical need and harm caused by the indifference. Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096.

23

Deliberate indifference may also be shown when a prison official intentionally denies,

24

delays, or interferes with medical treatment or by the way prison doctors respond to the

25

prisoner’s medical needs. Estelle, 429 U.S. at 104-05; Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096.

26
27

care for the prisoner’s safety. Farmer, 511 U.S. at 835. “Neither negligence nor gross

28
JDDL-K

Deliberate indifference is a higher standard than negligence or lack of ordinary due

negligence will constitute deliberate indifference.” Clement v. California Dep’t of
-6-

1

Corrections, 220 F. Supp. 2d 1098, 1105 (N.D. Cal. 2002); see also Broughton v. Cutter

2

Labs., 622 F.2d 458, 460 (9th Cir. 1980) (mere claims of “indifference,” “negligence,” or

3

“medical malpractice” do not support a claim under § 1983). “A difference of opinion does

4

not amount to deliberate indifference to [a plaintiff’s] serious medical needs.” Sanchez v.

5

Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir. 1989). A mere delay in medical care, without more, is

6

insufficient to state a claim against prison officials for deliberate indifference. See Shapley

7

v. Nevada Bd. of State Prison Comm’rs, 766 F.2d 404, 407 (9th Cir. 1985). The indifference

8

must be substantial. The action must rise to a level of “unnecessary and wanton infliction

9

of pain.” Estelle, 429 U.S. at 105.

10

In Count II, Plaintiff alleges that after the assault, he was taken to a concealed area by

11

prison staff where he lay unconscious for several hours rather than being taken to the hospital

12

as provided in prison policies. Plaintiff fails to connect these allegations to any named

13

Defendant. For that reason, he fails to state a claim in Count II and it will be dismissed.

14

D.

Retaliation

15

Plaintiff designates Count III as a claim for retaliation. To state a constitutional claim

16

for retaliation, a plaintiff must allege that a defendant acting under color of state law took

17

adverse action against him because he engaged in protected conduct, the adverse action was

18

not narrowly tailored to advance legitimate goals, and the adverse action chilled the

19

plaintiff’s exercise of his First Amendment rights or caused him to suffer more than minimal

20

harm. Rhodes v. Robinson, 408 F.3d 559, 567-58 (9th Cir. 2005); see also Hines v. Gomez,

21

108 F.3d 265, 267 (9th Cir. 1997) (retaliation claims requires an inmate must show (1) that

22

the prison official acted in retaliation for the exercise of a constitutionally-protected right,

23

and (2) that the action “advanced no legitimate penological interest”).

24
25

sought medical care following the attack. While Plaintiff alleges that adverse action was

26

taken against him for engaging in protected conduct, he fails to connect the adverse acts to

27

any Defendant. Plaintiff also fails to specify when the acts occurred, the property lost, or the

28
JDDL-K

Plaintiff asserts that unidentified guards took adverse action against him after he

amount removed from his inmate trust account. For these reasons, Plaintiff fails to state a
-7-

1

claim in Count III.

2

V.

Leave to Amend

3

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state

4

a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a first

5

amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will mail

6

Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails

7

to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended complaint and dismiss this

8

action without further notice to Plaintiff.

9

Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First

10

Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its

11

entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original

12

Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count.

13

A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963

14

F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542,

15

1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original complaint as

16

nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original

17

complaint is waived if it is not raised in a first amended complaint. King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d

18

565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).

19

VI.

Motion for Injunctive Relief

20
21

injunctive relief, the moving party must show “that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that

22

he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance

23

of equities tips in his favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest.” Winter v. Natural

24

Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 22 (2008); Am. Trucking Assoc., Inc. v. City of Los

25

Angeles, 559 F.3d 1046, 1052 (9th Cir. 2009). The moving party has the burden of proof on

26

each element of the test. Environmental Council of Sacramento v. Slater, 184 F. Supp. 2d

27

1016, 1027 (E.D. Cal. 2000). In addition, the “serious questions” version of the sliding scale

28
JDDL-K

As noted above, Plaintiff has filed a motion for injunctive relief. (Doc. 5.) To obtain

test for preliminary injunctions remains viable after the Supreme Court’s decision in Winter.
-8-

1

Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F. 3d 1127, 1134-35 (9th Cir. 2011). Under

2

that test, a preliminary injunction is appropriate when a plaintiff demonstrates that “serious

3

questions going to the merits were raised and the balance of hardships tips sharply in

4

[plaintiff’s] favor.” Id. (citing Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 987 (9th Cir. 2008)

5

(en banc)). That approach requires that the elements of the preliminary injunction test be

6

balanced, so that a stronger showing of one element may offset a weaker showing of another.

7

“For example, a stronger showing of irreparable harm to plaintiff might offset a lesser

8

showing of likelihood of success on the merits.” Alliance for the Wild Rockies, 632 F.3d at

9

1135. A plaintiff must also satisfy the other Winter factors, including the likelihood of

10

irreparable harm. Id. Further, “[n]o preliminary injunction shall be issued without notice to

11

the adverse party.” Fed.R.Civ. P. 65(a)(1). In addition, a temporary restraining order

12

without notice may be granted only if the applicant certifies to the court in writing the efforts,

13

if any, that he made to give notice and the reasons that notice should not be required.

14

Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(b).

15

In his motion, Plaintiff states that fellow employees of the Defendants have tampered

16

with his out-going mail by copying it and providing it to non-employees. He alleges “they”

17

have also used “others” to impede contact with family, the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the

18

Federal Bureau of Investigations, and have threatened Plaintiff’s life “simply for exercising

19

his guaranteed First Amendment . . . to ask the Government for re-dress of grievance.” (Doc.

20

5 at 2.) Plaintiff seeks an order to Defendants and their fellow employees to stop threatening

21

Plaintiff and send his outgoing mail to the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the FBI. Plaintiff’s

22

motion does not reflect service on the Defendants nor does he certify in writing the efforts

23

he made to give notice to the Defendant or reasons why such notice should not be required.

24

Moreover, Plaintiff makes only conclusory assertions against non-Defendants. Plaintiff’s

25

motion will be denied.

26

VII.

Warnings

27
28
JDDL-K

A.

Release

Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release.
-9-

1

Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay

2

the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result

3

in dismissal of this action.

4

B.

5

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule

6

83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other

7

relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this

8

action.

9

C.

Address Changes

Copies

10

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See

11

LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice

12

to Plaintiff.

13

D.

Possible “Strike”

14

Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff fails

15

to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the

16

dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

17

Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil

18

judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior

19

occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a

20

court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious,

21

or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under

22

imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

23
24

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these

25

warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at

26

1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the

27

Court).

28
JDDL-K

E.

/

/

Possible Dismissal

/
- 10 -

1

IT IS ORDERED:

2

(1)

Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. (Doc. 2.)

3

(2)

As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency,

4
5

Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $25.38.
(3)

The Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff has

6

30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with

7

this Order.

8
9
10
11
12

(4)

If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of

Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice
that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
(5)

The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil

rights complaint by a prisoner.

13

(6)

Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief is denied. (Doc. 5.)

14

DATED this 16th day of October, 2011.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JDDL-K

- 11 -

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated
persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These
complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form
should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state
conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas
corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence,
you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that
entered the judgment.
2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by
incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or
neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All
questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If
needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard
letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and
number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional
or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to
cite law.
3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of
a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.
4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $350.00. If you are unable to immediately
pay the filing fee, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the
“Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in
Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.
5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and
of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court
if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be
identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.
6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined
when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined
in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were
confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott
Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file
in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $350 filing
fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Revised 3/9/07

1

Phoenix & Prescott Divisions:
OR
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130
401 West Washington Street, SPC 10
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119

Tucson Division:
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500
405 West Congress Street
Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing
of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your
mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case.
8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you
submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis).
Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma
pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date
a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a
certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed
this
(month, day, year) to:
Name:
Address:
Attorney for Defendant(s)
(Signature)
9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint,
you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the courtapproved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave
(permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to
amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an
amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv
15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are
considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison
Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time.
10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint.
Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use
to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.
11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff
of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written
pleading or motion.
2

12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.
HEADING:
1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing
address on the lines provided.
2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you
name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line,
write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the
names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1A” at the bottom.
3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED”
in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do
so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are
seeking only injunctive relief.
Part A. JURISDICTION:
1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics
Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of
that authority.
2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights
occurred.
3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the
spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the
necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,”
“2-B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:
You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while
you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces
provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary
information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:
You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to
allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three
counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate
page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page
5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.
3

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the
violation of only one civil right per count.
2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your
claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,”
you must identify the specific issue involved.
3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must
state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each
individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you
must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which
the act(s) occurred, if possible.
4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.
5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies
before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you
should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or
administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures
were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.
Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided.
SIGNATURE:
You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign
the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not
bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.

FINAL NOTE
You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your
complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper
space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional
pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach
additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and
number the pages.

4

Name and Prisoner/Booking Number

Place of Confinement

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip Code

(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

(Full Name of Plaintiff)

Plaintiff,
vs.

(1)
(Full Name of Defendant)

(2)
(3)
(4)
Defendant(s).

G

Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them.

)
, )
)
)
) CASE NO.
)
(To be supplied by the Clerk)
, )
)
, )
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT
)
, )
BY A PRISONER
)
, )
G Original Complaint
G First Amended Complaint
)
)
G Second Amended Complaint

A. JURISDICTION
1.

2.

This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:
G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
G Other:

.

Institution/city where violation occurred:

.

Revised 3/9/07

1

550/555

B. DEFENDANTS
1.

Name of first Defendant:
at

. The first Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

2.

(Institution)

Name of second Defendant:
at

. The second Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

3.

(Institution)

Name of third Defendant:
at

. The third Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

4.

(Institution)

Name of fourth Defendant:
at

. The fourth Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

(Institution)

If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.

C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
1.

Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner?

2.

If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed?

G Yes

G No

. Describe the previous lawsuits:

a. First prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

b. Second prior lawsuit:
v.
1. Parties:
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

c. Third prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.

2

D. CAUSE OF ACTION

1.

COUNT I
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies:
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
3

1.

COUNT II
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
at your institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
4

1.

COUNT III
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.

If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.

5

E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
State the relief you are seeking:

.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
DATE

SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF

(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or
other person who helped prepare this complaint)

(Signature of attorney, if any)

(Attorney’s address & telephone number)

ADDITIONAL PAGES
All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may
attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent
applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued
and number all pages.

6