Quanta Indemnity Company v. Amberwood Development Incorporated, et al

Filing 49

ORDER striking the 47 second amended complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must file the supplement required by this Court's order of June 14, 2012, by June 28, 2012. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 6/26/2012. (LFIG)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) North American Specialty Insurance) Company; General Fidelity Insurance) Company; Amberwood Development Inc.;) Amberwood Homes LLC; Roll Tide LLP;) Summerset Marketing Enterprises Inc.;) ) Winston Casas LLC, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Quanta Indemnity Company, No. CV 11-1807-PHX-JAT ORDER 18 19 On June 14, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a supplement to the first amended 20 complaint to allow this Court to independently review its jurisdiction. Plaintiff filed a second 21 amended complaint. An amended complaint completely supersedes the prior complaint. 22 Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, a party cannot 23 use an “et al.” designation on an amended complaint. Additionally, the Court allowed a 24 supplement to the amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(d), not a 25 completely amended complaint under 15(a). For both of these reasons, the second amended 26 complaint, filed without leave of Court, is improper. 27 Therefore, 28 IT IS ORDERED striking the second amended complaint (Doc. 47). 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must file the supplement required by this 2 Court’s order of June 14, 2012, by June 28, 2012.1 3 DATED this 26th day of June, 2012. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Plaintiff is cautioned that saying “none of the individuals or partners of Amberwood Homes, Roll Tide, L.L.P, Summerset, or Winston Casas are citizens of Colorado or New York” is inadequate to plead jurisdiction. Plaintiff must name every member or partner and state their citizenship to allow this Court to independently consider its jurisdiction. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?