Muhammad v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al

Filing 28

ORDER denying 27 Plaintiff's Motion to Produce Copies and Waive or Defer Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 9/5/12.(DMT)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Riki Rashaad Muhammad, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.,) ) Defendants. ) ) ) No. CV-11-1890-PHX-SMM (LOA) ORDER 15 This matter arises on Plaintiff’s second Motion to Produce Copies and Waive or Defer 16 Costs. (Doc. 27) Plaintiff filed a nearly identical request on July 30, 2012, doc. 24, which 17 the Court denied on August 7, 2012, doc. 26. Plaintiff states that he was granted in forma 18 pauperis, but that the Arizona Department of Corrections did not allow him “indigent” 19 status, and therefore, he must pay for all copies and postage. He again requests that all 20 “necessary” copies be produced. (Doc. 27 at 1) And again, he does not specify which 21 documents he wishes to receive. As stated in the Court’s August 7, 2012 Order, it is the 22 Court’s practice, and the docket reflects this, that copies of filed documents are being sent 23 to Plaintiff. 24 Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2006) permits a court to allow a plaintiff to file a complaint 25 without payment of fees or security, under specific circumstances. Section 1915(a)(1) states 26 that: 27 28 Subject to subsection (b), any court of the United States may authorize the commencement, prosecution or defense of any suit, action or proceeding, civil or 1 2 3 criminal, or appeal therein, without prepayment of fees or security therefor, by a person who submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such prisoner possesses [and] that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor. Such affidavit shall state the nature of the action, defense or appeal and affiant’s belief that the person is entitled to redress. 4 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). 5 Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status does not exempt him from paying for all court 6 costs and litigation expenses. If granted in forma pauperis status, 28 U.S.C. § 1915 permits 7 the waiver of prepayment of filing and service of process fees and costs for in forma pauperis 8 litigants. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), (d); Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3); Stewart v. De Paul, 2012 WL 9 1610075, at *1-2 (S.D. Cal. May 8, 2012) (citing Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 10 (9th Cir. 1999)). Aside from the specific costs waived pursuant to § 1915(a) and (d), no other 11 statute authorizes courts to commit federal monies for payment of the necessary expenses in 12 a civil suit brought by an indigent litigant. See Valdez v. Linder, 2008 WL 5435896, at *10 13 (D. Mont. April 25, 2008) (denying motion for copies because “[t]here is no provision in the 14 statute for the payment by the government of the costs of deposition transcripts, or any other 15 litigation expenses, and no other statute authorizes courts to commit federal monies for 16 payment of the necessary expenses in a civil suit brought by an indigent litigant.”) (quoting 17 Tabron v. Grace, 6 F.3d 147, 159 (3rd Cir. 1993)); see also Moss v. ITT Continental Baking 18 Co., 83 F.R.D. 624, 625 (E.D. Va. 1979); Haymes v. Smith, 73 F.R.D. 572, 574 (W.D.N.Y. 19 1976). For example, section 1915 does not authorize the expenditure of public funds for 20 expert witness or subpoena fees. See, e.g., Tuvalu v. Woodford, 2006 WL 3201096, at *5 21 (E.D. Cal. November 2, 2006) (citing Boring v. Kozakiewicz, 833 F.2d 468, 474 (3d Cir. 22 1987) (no provision to pay fees for expert witnesses); Tedder v. Odel, 890 F.2d 210, 211-12 23 (9th Cir. 1989) (“We join the Third, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Circuits in finding [that] . 24 . . section 1915[]” “does not permit a waiver of the witness fees to be tendered with the 25 subpoena.”) (citations omitted). 26 Accordingly, 27 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Produce Copies and Waive or Defer 28 -2- 1 2 Costs, doc. 27, is DENIED. DATED this 5th day of September, 2012. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?