Iglesias v. Goodyear, City of

Filing 102

IT IS ORDERED DENYING plaintiff's counsel's renewed motion to withdraw 98 . Counsel may file a renewed motion to withdraw concurrently with his response to the motion for summary judgment (see order for details). Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 10/29/12.(JAMA)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Julio Iglesias, 9 Plaintiff, 10 vs. 11 12 The City of Goodyear, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 11-01891-PHX-FJM ORDER We have before us plaintiff's counsel's renewed motion to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff (doc. 98) and defendant's response (doc. 99). Plaintiff did not reply. 17 Plaintiff's counsel's renewed motion to withdraw is premature. In a previous order 18 (doc. 97), we denied plaintiff's counsel's motion to withdraw (doc. 87) noting that plaintiff 19 would be prejudiced if his lawyer withdraws while the response to the motion for summary 20 judgment is pending. We advised plaintiff's counsel that he could file a renewed motion to 21 withdraw along with his response to the pending motion. Because plaintiff's counsel has not 22 filed a response to the motion for summary judgment, we will not consider the renewed 23 motion to withdraw at this time. 24 IT IS ORDERED DENYING plaintiff's counsel's renewed motion to withdraw (doc. 25 98). Counsel may file a renewed motion to withdraw concurrently with his response to the 26 motion for summary judgment. 27 28 DATED this 29th day of October, 2012.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?