St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company et al v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Company et al

Filing 394

ORDER granting 389 Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief Opposing Efforts to Vacate this Court's Order Dated 8/15/2014. Del Webb is granted 21 days to file its brief. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 10/8/2014.(LMR)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) Lexington Insurance Company, ) American Home Insurance Company, ) Commerce & Industry Insurance Company, and Liberty Mutual Insurance ) ) Company, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Zurich American Insurance Company, ) ) Cross-Claimant, ) ) v. ) ) Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, ) American Safety Indemnity Company, ) Lexington Insurance Company, ) American Home Insurance Company, ) Commerce & Industry Insurance ) Company, and Liberty Mutual Insurance ) Company, ) ) Cross-Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company, and Travelers Indemnity Company of America, No. CV-11-1954-PHX-SMM ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 American Home Insurance Company and ) Commerce & Industry Insurance ) Company, ) ) Counter/Cross-Claimants, ) ) v. ) ) St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance ) Company, Charter Oak Fire Insurance ) Company, Travelers Indemnity Company) of America, Ohio Casualty Insurance ) Company, Maryland Casualty Company, ) Zurich American Insurance Company, ) and American Guarantee & Liability ) Insurance Company, ) ) Counter/Cross-Defendants. ) ) ) ) Lexington Insurance Company, ) ) Counter/Cross-Claimant, ) ) v. ) ) St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance ) Company, Charter Oak Fire Insurance ) Company, Travelers Indemnity Company) of America, Ohio Casualty Insurance ) Company, Maryland Casualty Company, ) Zurich American Insurance Company, ) and American Guarantee & Liability ) Insurance Company, ) ) Counter/Cross-Defendants. ) ) 21 Before the Court is an unopposed motion for leave to file an amicus brief 22 submitted by Del Webb Corporation, Del Webb Communities, Inc., Del Webb’s Home 23 Construction, Inc., and Pulte Homes, Inc. n/k/a PulteGroup, Inc. (collectively “Del 24 Webb”). (Doc. 389.) Having reviewed the motion, the Court will grant Del Webb the 25 opportunity to file a brief as amicus curiae. 26 /// 27 28 /// -2- 1 Standard of Review As noted by Del Webb, a district court has broad discretion to permit individuals 2 3 or entities to participate in a case as amici curiae. Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1237, 1260 4 (9th Cir.1982), abrogated on other grounds by Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 115 S.Ct. 5 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995). Though not a party to the case, an amicus curiae serves to 6 provide assistance in a case of general interest, supplement the efforts of counsel in the 7 case, and draw the court's attention to legal arguments that have escaped consideration. 8 Miller–Wohl Co. v. Comm'r of Labor and Indus., 694 F.2d 203, 204 (9th Cir.1982); See 9 Funbus Sys., Inc. v. Cal. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 801 F.2d 1120, 1125 (9th Cir.1986). 10 11 Discussion 12 Del Webb contends that it has spent “significant time and energy working with its 13 additional insurers to develop a mutually agreeable allocation of unreimbursed…defense 14 costs” to no avail and thus moves the Court to allow Del Webb to file an amicus brief. 15 (Doc. 389 at 3.) Indeed, the parties have forced the Court to expend vast resources to 16 decide each party’s duty to defend--a relatively simple legal issue. On August 15, 2014, 17 almost three years from the Plaintiff’s original complaint (Doc. 1), the Court declared 18 that all parties remaining in the action had a duty to defend Del Webb in proportion to 19 their respective policy limits quotients as described by that Order. (Doc. 381 at 13.) In 20 two separate motions, the parties now move to vacate the Court’s ruling. (Docs. 384; 21 386.) The parties also submit a tentative settlement agreement to the Court to which all 22 but one of the parties have agreed. (Doc 386-1.) Thus, despite the Court’s Order and, 23 evidently, the parties’ subsequent settlement talks, (Docs. 381; 368) the parties continue 24 to dispute their liability. Meanwhile, Del Webb continues to cover costs it believes one or 25 more of the providers in this action should pay. Good cause showing, 26 27 /// 28 -3- 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEARBY ORDERED GRANTING Del Webb’s Motion for Leave to File 3 Amicus Brief Opposing Efforts to Vacate this Court’s Order Dated August 15, 2014. 4 (Doc. 389). Del Webb is granted 21 days from the Order to file its brief. All relevant local 5 rules shall apply. 6 7 DATED the 8th of October, 2014. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?