Barkclay v. Phoenix College et al

Filing 13

ORDER re 12 USCA Order, 11-17459, the Court concludes that Plaintiff provided no reasonable basis for a TRO in this Court (see Doc. 7), and that her appeal of the denial of the TRO is therefore frivolous. The Court therefore revokes Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue the action in this Court, she must reapply for in forma pauperis status. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/1/11. (LSP)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Alexandria Barkclay,
Plaintiff,

10
11
12
13

No. CV11-1968-PHX-DGC
ORDER

vs.
Phoenix College, et al.,
Defendant.

14
15

The Court has received the Ninth Circuit's referral to determine whether Plaintiff's

16

appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. Doc. 12. The Court concludes that Plaintiff

17

provided no reasonable basis for a TRO in this Court (see Doc. 7), and that her appeal of

18

the denial of the TRO is therefore frivolous. The Court therefore revokes Plaintiff's in

19

forma pauperis status. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue the action in this Court, she must re-

20

apply for in forma pauperis status.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated this 1st day of November, 2011.