McCowan v. Kendall et al

Filing 5

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; the Complaint 1 is dismissed for failure to state a claim; Plaintiff has 30 days to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order; if Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Clerk must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/12/11.(REW)

1
2

KM

WO

3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

7
Marlon Corwin McCowan,
8
Plaintiff,
9
vs.
10
Dennis Kendall, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV 11-2071-PHX-DGC (ECV)
ORDER

13

Plaintiff Marlon Corwin McCowan, who is confined in the Maricopa County Fourth

14

Avenue Jail, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an

15

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Court will dismiss the Complaint with leave

16

to amend.

17

I.

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee

18

Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C.

19

§ 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).

20

The Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of $14.61. The remainder of the fee will be

21

collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income each time the amount

22

in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a separate

23

Order requiring the appropriate government agency to collect and forward the fees according

24

to the statutory formula.

25

II.

Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints

26
27

a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.

28
JDDL-K

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against

§ 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised

1

claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may

2

be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.

3

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).

4

A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the

5

pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 does not

6

demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant-

7

unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009).

8

“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory

9

statements, do not suffice.” Id.

10

“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a

11

claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,

12

550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual content

13

that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the

14

misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for

15

relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial

16

experience and common sense.” Id. at 1950. Thus, although a plaintiff’s specific factual

17

allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must assess whether there

18

are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id. at 1951.

19

But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, courts

20

must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th

21

Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less stringent standards

22

than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89,

23

94 (2007) (per curiam)).

24
25

a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal of the

26

action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The Court

27

should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type of advice “would

28
JDDL-K

If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts,

undermine district judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225,
-2-

1

231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to decide whether the court was

2

required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). The Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint

3

for failure to state a claim, but because the Complaint may possibly be saved by amendment,

4

will dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend.

5

III.

Complaint

6

Plaintiff names the following Defendants in the Complaint: Facility Health

7

Administrator Dennis Kendall, Regional Health Administrator Jim Taylor, Arizona

8

Department of Corrections Director Charles L. Ryan, Arizona Department of Corrections

9

Health Services, Unknown Healthcare Provider, Grievance Coordinator D. Daniels, and

10

Maricopa Medical Center.

11
12

Amendment rights were violated when he was not provided with surgery for a broken hand.

13

Plaintiff alleges that on October 21, 2009, his hand was broken when he was assaulted by

14

another inmate. Plaintiff was seen by a specialist who recommended surgery. Plaintiff states

15

that on November 2, 2009, he was transported to Maricopa Medical Center for surgery, but

16

that after he informed the orthopedic surgeon he has hepatitis C, the surgeon left the room

17

and never returned to speak with Plaintiff. Plaintiff states that he was told that if he had the

18

surgery, it would have to be scheduled with the Arizona Department of Corrections and

19

Maricopa Medical Center and that Plaintiff was then transported back to his unit. Plaintiff

20

claims that after he was returned to his unit, he did not see a medical provider until December

21

17, 2009, although he requested medical treatment for his hand. Plaintiff filed a grievance

22

regarding the surgery, to which Defendant Kendall responded “the state contracts have been

23

cancelled with hospitals and providers. We are currently developing contracts, you are

24

placed on the schedule with an Orthopedic Surgeon.” Plaintiff again filed a grievance on

25

February 8, 2010, to which Defendant Taylor replied that Plaintiff had been scheduled for

26

additional tests. Plaintiff further claims Defendant Daniels told Plaintiff that he could not

27

help Plaintiff with the issue. Plaintiff appealed to Defendant Ryan, who responded that

28
JDDL-K

Plaintiff raises two claims for relief. In Count I, Plaintiff claims that his Eighth

Plaintiff was scheduled to meet with a healthcare provider in September 2010. Plaintiff
-3-

1

claims that he was never seen by a healthcare provider in September 2010 and never received

2

any additional treatment for his hand. Plaintiff claims that his hand healed improperly and

3

is disfigured because of lack of treatment.

4

In Count II, Plaintiff claims that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated when the

5

Orthopedic surgeon failed to perform surgery on Plaintiff after discovering that Plaintiff had

6

hepatitis C. Plaintiff also claims that Defendant Ryan cut funds to treat inmates with

7

hepatitis C.

8
9

Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and money damages.
IV.

Failure to State a Claim

10

A.

Improper Defendants

11

Arizona Department of Corrections Health Services is simply an administrative

12

division of the Arizona Department of Corrections and, therefore, is not a proper Defendant.

13

Under the Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, a state or state

14

agency may not be sued in federal court without its consent. Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp.

15

v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89, 100 (1984); Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989).

16

Furthermore, “a state is not a ‘person’ for purposes of section 1983. Likewise ‘arms of the

17

State’ such as the Arizona Department of Corrections are not ‘persons’ under section 1983.”

18

Gilbreath v. Cutter Biological, Inc., 931 F.2d 1320, 1327 (9th Cir. 1991) (citation omitted).

19

Therefore, the Court will dismiss Defendant Arizona Department of Corrections Health

20

Services.

21
22

Center is simply an administrative creation of Maricopa County and not a “person” amenable

23

to suit pursuant to § 1983. Accordingly, the Maricopa Medical Center will be dismissed

24

from this action.

25

B.

26

Although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519,

27

520-21 (1972), conclusory and vague allegations will not support a cause of action. Ivey v.

28
JDDL-K

Similarly, Maricopa Medical Center is not a proper Defendant. The Maricopa Medical

Board of Regents of the University of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). Further,

Count I

-4-

1

a liberal interpretation of a civil rights complaint may not supply essential elements of the

2

claim that were not initially pled. Id. Finally, to state a valid claim under § 1983, plaintiffs

3

must allege that they suffered a specific injury as a result of specific conduct of a defendant

4

and show an affirmative link between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. See

5

Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976).

6

In Count I, Plaintiff has not linked the denial of his hand surgery to any particular

7

defendant or the policies of a particular Defendant. It is therefore unclear which Defendant

8

or Defendants were responsible for denying Plaintiff his hand surgery. Plaintiff has failed to

9

state a claim with respect to these allegations.

10

To the extent that Plaintiff alleges a violation of his constitutional rights based on the

11

denial of his grievances, the mere denial of or failure to respond to a grievance does not give

12

rise to the inference of active unconstitutional behavior. Where a defendant’s only

13

involvement in the allegedly unconstitutional conduct is the denial of administrative

14

grievances, the failure to intervene on a prisoner’s behalf to remedy alleged unconstitutional

15

behavior does not amount to active unconstitutional behavior for purposes of § 1983. Shehee

16

v. Luttrell, 199 F.3d 295, 300 (6th Cir. 1999).

17

Plaintiff has therefore failed to state a claim in Count I.

18

C.

19

In Count II, Plaintiff claims that the orthopedic surgeon at the Maricopa Medical

20

Center denied Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment rights by failing to perform surgery on

21

Plaintiff’s hand after discovering Plaintiff has hepatitis C. The Court notes first that Plaintiff

22

has not named the orthopedic surgeon as a Defendant to the Complaint. Even if Plaintiff had

23

named the orthopedic surgeon, Plaintiff’s allegations do not state an Eighth Amendment

24

medical claim.

Count II

25
26

violation of the Eighth Amendment. To state a § 1983 medical claim, a plaintiff must show

27

that the defendants acted with “deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.” Jett v.

28
JDDL-K

Not every claim by a prisoner relating to inadequate medical treatment states a

Penner, 439 F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104
-5-

1

(1976)). A plaintiff must show (1) a “serious medical need” by demonstrating that failure

2

to treat the condition could result in further significant injury or the unnecessary and wanton

3

infliction of pain and (2) the defendant’s response was deliberately indifferent. Jett, 439 F.3d

4

at 1096 (quotations omitted).

5

“Deliberate indifference is a high legal standard.” Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051,

6

1060 (9th Cir. 2004). To act with deliberate indifference, a prison official must both know

7

of and disregard an excessive risk to inmate health; “the official must both be aware of facts

8

from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and

9

he must also draw the inference.” Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994). Deliberate

10

indifference in the medical context may be shown by a purposeful act or failure to respond

11

to a prisoner’s pain or possible medical need and harm caused by the indifference. Jett, 439

12

F.3d at 1096. Deliberate indifference may also be shown when a prison official intentionally

13

denies, delays, or interferes with medical treatment or by the way prison doctors respond to

14

the prisoner’s medical needs. Estelle, 429 U.S. at 104-05; Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096.

15

Deliberate indifference is a higher standard than negligence or lack of ordinary due

16

care for the prisoner’s safety. Farmer, 511 U.S. at 835. “Neither negligence nor gross

17

negligence will constitute deliberate indifference.” Clement v. California Dep’t of

18

Corrections, 220 F. Supp. 2d 1098, 1105 (N.D. Cal. 2002); see also Broughton v. Cutter

19

Labs., 622 F.2d 458, 460 (9th Cir. 1980) (mere claims of “indifference,” “negligence,” or

20

“medical malpractice” do not support a claim under § 1983). “A difference of opinion does

21

not amount to deliberate indifference to [a plaintiff’s] serious medical needs.” Sanchez v.

22

Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir. 1989). A mere delay in medical care, without more, is

23

insufficient to state a claim against prison officials for deliberate indifference. See Shapley

24

v. Nevada Bd. of State Prison Comm’rs, 766 F.2d 404, 407 (9th Cir. 1985). The indifference

25

must be substantial. The action must rise to a level of “unnecessary and wanton infliction

26

of pain.” Estelle, 429 U.S. at 105.

27
28
JDDL-K

In this case, the surgeon’s motive for failing to perform surgery on Plaintiff’s hand
is unclear; Plaintiff has not alleged facts showing that the surgeon was deliberately
-6-

1

indifferent to Plaintiff’s medical needs. Plaintiff’s facts suggest that Plaintiff may not have

2

been scheduled for surgery on November 2, 2009, but was only being seen for an initial

3

examination by the surgeon, with surgery to be scheduled later, and that failure to schedule

4

the surgery was the fault of an individual at the Arizona Department of Corrections.

5

To the extent that Plaintiff claims Defendants Ryan and Governor Brewer have cut

6

funding for treatment of inmates with hepatitis C, Plaintiff has not sufficiently linked this

7

claim to his injuries. Plaintiff has not demonstrated how cuts in funding for hepatitis C

8

treatment affected his ability to receive surgery for an injury not related to his hepatitis C

9

condition. Plaintiff has therefore failed to state a claim in Count II.

10

V.

Leave to Amend

11

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state

12

a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a first

13

amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will mail

14

Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails

15

to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended complaint and dismiss this

16

action without further notice to Plaintiff.

17

If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements

18

telling the Court: (1) the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated; (2) the name of

19

the Defendant who violated the right; (3) exactly what that Defendant did or failed to do;

20

(4) how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of Plaintiff’s

21

constitutional right; and (5) what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of that

22

Defendant’s conduct. See Rizzo, 423 U.S. at 371-72, 377.

23

Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he names as a Defendant. If Plaintiff

24

fails to affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific injury

25

suffered by Plaintiff, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for failure to

26

state a claim. Conclusory allegations that a Defendant or group of Defendants have

27

violated a constitutional right are not acceptable and will be dismissed.

28
JDDL-K

Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First
-7-

1

Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its

2

entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original

3

Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count.

4

A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963

5

F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542,

6

1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original complaint as

7

nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original

8

complaint is waived if it is not raised in a first amended complaint. King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d

9

565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).

10

VI.

Warnings

11

A.

Release

12

Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release.

13

Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay

14

the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result

15

in dismissal of this action.

16

B.

Address Changes

17

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule

18

83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other

19

relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this

20

action.

21

C.

Copies

22

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See

23

LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice

24

to Plaintiff.

25
26

Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff fails

27

to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the

28
JDDL-K

D.

Possible “Strike”

dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
-8-

1

Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil

2

judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior

3

occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a

4

court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious,

5

or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under

6

imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

7

E.

Possible Dismissal

8

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these

9

warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at

10

1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the

11

Court).

12

IT IS ORDERED:

13

(1)

Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 3) is granted.

14

(2)

As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency,

15
16

Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $14.61.
(3)

The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has

17

30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with

18

this Order.

19

(4)

If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of

20

Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice

21

that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

22
23
24

(5)

The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil

rights complaint by a prisoner.
DATED this 12th day of December, 2011.

25
26
27
28
JDDL-K

-9-

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated
persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These
complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form
should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state
conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas
corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence,
you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that
entered the judgment.
2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by
incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or
neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All
questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If
needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard
letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and
number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional
or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to
cite law.
3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of
a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.
4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $350.00. If you are unable to immediately
pay the filing fee, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the
“Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in
Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.
5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and
of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court
if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be
identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.
6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined
when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined
in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were
confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott
Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file
in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $350 filing
fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Revised 3/9/07

1

Phoenix & Prescott Divisions:
OR
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130
401 West Washington Street, SPC 10
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119

Tucson Division:
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500
405 West Congress Street
Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing
of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your
mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case.
8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you
submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis).
Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma
pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date
a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a
certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed
this
(month, day, year) to:
Name:
Address:
Attorney for Defendant(s)
(Signature)
9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint,
you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the courtapproved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave
(permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to
amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an
amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv
15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are
considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison
Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time.
10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint.
Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use
to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.
11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff
of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written
pleading or motion.
2

12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.
HEADING:
1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing
address on the lines provided.
2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you
name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line,
write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the
names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1A” at the bottom.
3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED”
in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do
so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are
seeking only injunctive relief.
Part A. JURISDICTION:
1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics
Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of
that authority.
2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights
occurred.
3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the
spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the
necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,”
“2-B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:
You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while
you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces
provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary
information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:
You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to
allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three
counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate
page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page
5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.
3

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the
violation of only one civil right per count.
2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your
claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,”
you must identify the specific issue involved.
3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must
state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each
individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you
must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which
the act(s) occurred, if possible.
4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.
5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies
before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you
should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or
administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures
were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.
Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided.
SIGNATURE:
You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign
the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not
bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.

FINAL NOTE
You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your
complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper
space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional
pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach
additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and
number the pages.

4

Name and Prisoner/Booking Number

Place of Confinement

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip Code

(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

(Full Name of Plaintiff)

Plaintiff,
vs.

(1)
(Full Name of Defendant)

(2)
(3)
(4)
Defendant(s).

G

Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them.

)
, )
)
)
) CASE NO.
)
(To be supplied by the Clerk)
, )
)
, )
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT
)
, )
BY A PRISONER
)
, )
G Original Complaint
G First Amended Complaint
)
)
G Second Amended Complaint

A. JURISDICTION
1.

2.

This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:
G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
G Other:

.

Institution/city where violation occurred:

.

Revised 3/9/07

1

550/555

B. DEFENDANTS
1.

Name of first Defendant:
at

. The first Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

2.

(Institution)

Name of second Defendant:
at

. The second Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

3.

(Institution)

Name of third Defendant:
at

. The third Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

4.

(Institution)

Name of fourth Defendant:
at

. The fourth Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

(Institution)

If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.

C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
1.

Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner?

2.

If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed?

G Yes

G No

. Describe the previous lawsuits:

a. First prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

b. Second prior lawsuit:
v.
1. Parties:
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

c. Third prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.

2

D. CAUSE OF ACTION

1.

COUNT I
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies:
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
3

1.

COUNT II
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
at your institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
4

1.

COUNT III
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.

If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.

5

E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
State the relief you are seeking:

.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
DATE

SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF

(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or
other person who helped prepare this complaint)

(Signature of attorney, if any)

(Attorney’s address & telephone number)

ADDITIONAL PAGES
All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may
attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent
applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued
and number all pages.

6