Arriaga-Sanchez v. United States of America

Filing 8

ORDER, that the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 22 in CR10-0753-PHX-DGC) is denied and the civil action opened in connection with this amended Motion (CV11-2149-PHX-DGC (JFM)) is dismissed wit h prejudice. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Courts procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/17/12. (DMT)

1
2

SC

WO

3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

United States of America,
Plaintiff,

10
11

v.

12

Eliseo Rufino Arriaga-Sanchez,
Defendant/Movant.

13
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV 11-2149-PHX-DGC (JFM)
No. CR 10-0753-PHX-DGC
ORDER

15

Movant Eliseo Rufino Arriaga-Sanchez, who is confined in the Eden Detention Center

16

in Eden, Texas, has filed a pro se Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence

17

by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Court will summarily

18

dismiss the motion.

19

I.

Procedural History

20

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Movant pleaded guilty to illegal re-entry after

21

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(1). The plea agreement provided for a

22

sentencing range of 4 to 125 months depending on Movant’s criminal history. On October

23

25, 2010, the Court sentenced Movant to a 46-month term of imprisonment followed by three

24

years on supervised release.

25

Movant seeks a reduction of his sentence. He argues that his equal protection rights

26

are being violated because as a deportable alien, he is ineligible for a one-year sentence

27

reduction for attending a drug treatment program during incarceration and for early release

28

to a half-way house.

1

II.

Summary Dismissal

2

A district court must summarily dismiss a § 2255 application “[i]f it plainly appears

3

from the motion, any attached exhibits, and the record of prior proceedings that the moving

4

party is not entitled to relief.” Rule 4(b), Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the

5

United States District Courts. When this standard is satisfied, neither a hearing nor a

6

response from the government is required. See Marrow v. United States, 772 F.2d 525, 526

7

(9th Cir. 1985); Baumann v. United States, 692 F.2d 565, 571 (9th Cir. 1982). In this case,

8

the record shows that summary dismissal under Rule 4(b) is warranted because Movant has

9

waived the right to bring a § 2255 motion.1

10

III.

Waiver

11

Movant has waived challenges to his sentence. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

12

has found that there are “strict standards for waiver of constitutional rights.” United States

13

v. Gonzalez-Flores, 418 F.3d 1093, 1102 (9th Cir. 2005). It is impermissible to presume

14

waiver from a silent record, and the Court must indulge every reasonable presumption

15

against waiver of fundamental constitutional rights. United States v. Hamilton, 391 F.3d

16

1066, 1071 (9th Cir. 2004). In this action, Movant’s waiver was clear, express, and

17

unequivocal.

18

Plea agreements are contractual in nature, and their plain language will generally be

19

enforced if the agreement is clear and unambiguous on its face. United States v. Jeronimo,

20

398 F.3d 1149, 1153 (9th Cir. 2005). A defendant may waive the statutory right to bring a

21

§ 2255 action challenging the length of his sentence. United States v. Pruitt, 32 F.3d 431,

22

433 (9th Cir. 1994); United States v. Abarca, 985 F.2d 1012, 1014 (9th Cir. 1992). The only

23

claims that cannot be waived are claims that the waiver itself was involuntary or that

24

ineffective assistance of counsel rendered the waiver involuntary. See Washington v.

25

Lampert, 422 F.3d 864, 871 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding that a plea agreement that waives the

26

right to file a federal habeas petition pursuant to § 2254 is unenforceable with respect to an

27
28

1

In addition, the Ninth Circuit explicitly rejected Movant’s equal protection argument
in McLean v. Crabtree, 173 F.3d 1176, 1185-86 (9th Cir. 1999).
-2-

1

ineffective assistance of counsel claim that challenges the voluntariness of the waiver); Pruitt,

2

32 F.3d at 433 (expressing doubt that a plea agreement could waive a claim that counsel

3

erroneously induced a defendant to plead guilty or accept a particular plea bargain); Abarca,

4

985 F.2d at 1014 (expressly declining to hold that a waiver forecloses a claim of ineffective

5

assistance or involuntariness of the waiver); see also Jeronimo, 398 F.3d at 1156 n.4

6

(declining to decide whether waiver of all statutory rights included claims implicating the

7

voluntariness of the waiver).

8

“Collateral attacks based on ineffective assistance of counsel claims that are

9

characterized as falling outside [the category of ineffective assistance of counsel claims

10

challenging the validity of the plea or the waiver] are waivable.” United States v.

11

Cockerham, 237 F.3d 1179, 1187 (10th Cir. 2001). See also Williams v. United States, 396

12

F.3d 1340, 1342 (11th Cir. 2005) (joining the Second, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Tenth

13

Circuits in holding that “a valid sentence-appeal waiver, entered into voluntarily and

14

knowingly, pursuant to a plea agreement, precludes the defendant from attempting to attack,

15

in a collateral proceeding, the sentence through a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel

16

during sentencing.”).

17

As part of his plea agreement, Movant made the following waiver:

18

Providing the defendant’s sentence is consistent with this agreement,
the defendant waives (1) any and all motions, defenses, probable cause
determinations, and objections that the defendant could assert to the
indictment or information; and (2) any right to file an appeal, any collateral
attack, and any other writ or motion that challenges the conviction, an
order of restitution or forfeiture, the entry of judgment against the
defendant, or any aspect of defendant’s sentence, including the manner in
which the sentence is determined, including but not limited to any appeals
under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and motions under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2255.
The defendant acknowledges that if the Court has sentenced the
defendant according to the terms of this agreement, this waiver shall
result in the dismissal of any appeal, collateral attack, or other motion the
defendant might file challenging the conviction, order of restitution or
forfeiture, or sentence in this case.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

(Doc. 18) (emphasis added). Movant indicated in his plea agreement that he had discussed
26
the terms with his attorney, agreed to the terms and conditions, and entered into the plea
27
voluntarily. (Id. at 5-6, 7-8.)
28
-3-

1

Movant’s assertions in his § 2255 motion all pertain to sentencing and not to the

2

voluntariness of the waiver. Movant expressly waived issues regarding the imposition of

3

sentence and expressly waived the right to bring a § 2255 motion. The Court accepted his

4

plea as voluntarily made. Consequently, the Court finds that Movant waived the sentencing

5

issues raised in his § 2255 motion. Thus, the Court will summarily dismiss the motion.

6

Accordingly,

7

IT IS ORDERED:

8

(1)

The Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

9

§ 2255 (Doc. 22 in CR10-0753-PHX-DGC) is denied and the civil action opened in

10

connection with this amended Motion (CV11-2149-PHX-DGC (JFM)) is dismissed with

11

prejudice. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly.

12

(2)

Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the event

13

Movant files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because

14

reasonable jurists would not find the Court’s procedural ruling debatable. See Slack v.

15

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

16

DATED this 17th day of April, 2012.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-