Mitchell v. Donahoe
Filing
14
ORDER denying 7 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 9 Defendant's Motion for More Definite Statement. Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint that meets the requirements set out above within fourteen (14) days of th e date of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an Amended Complaint within that time, the Clerk of the Court shall dismiss this case without further notice for failure to obey a Court order and failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 5/7/12.(DMT)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
7
8
Maris S. Mitchell,
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
12
No. CV11-2244-PHX-JAT
ORDER
v.
Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Defendant.
13
14
Currently pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration
15
(Doc. 7) and Defendant’s Motion for More Definite Statement (Doc. 9). The Court now
16
rules on the motions.
17
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
18
Plaintiff filed a Motion to Appoint Counsel on November 15, 2011. (Doc. 3.) The
19
Court denied that motion on November 23, 2011, citing Plaintiff’s failure to demonstrate
20
exceptional circumstances. (Doc. 6.)
21
On December 19, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s
22
ruling on her Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Doc. 7.) In her Motion for Reconsideration,
23
Plaintiff admits she did not know about the Bradshaw factors referenced in the Court’s
24
Order and describes her attempt to retain counsel to represent her in this case.
25
As the Court noted in its earlier Order, there is no constitutional right to appointed
26
counsel in a civil case. Ivey v. Bd. Of Regents of Univ. of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 269 (9th
27
Cir. 1982). But the Court may appoint counsel in “exceptional circumstances,” Wilborn
28
v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986), and, in civil rights employment
1
discrimination cases, when the court deems just, Bradshaw v. Zoological Soc’y of San
2
Diego, 662 F.2d 1301, 1318 (9th Cir. 1981).
3
The Court finds that Plaintiff’s attempts to retain counsel as described in her
4
Motion for Reconsideration do not constitute exceptional circumstances. The Court
5
further finds that Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration demonstrates her ability to
6
respond to Court orders and articulate her position. Finally, the Court finds that the letter
7
attached to Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration does not contribute to the Court’s
8
ability to assess the merit of Plaintiff’s claims. The Court therefore will deny the Motion
9
for Reconsideration.
MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
10
11
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e) provides that a party may move for a more
12
definite statement of a pleading if the pleading is so vague or ambiguous that the party
13
who is allowed a responsive pleading cannot reasonably prepare a response. A Rule
14
12(e) motion must point out the defects in the pleading and the details desired.
15
Defendant filed his Motion for More Definite Statement on November 23, 2011.
16
(Doc. 9.) Defendant claims that Plaintiff’s Complaint is so vague and ambiguous that he
17
cannot formulate a response.
18
In her Response to the Motion for More Definite Statement, Plaintiff does not
19
actually respond to Defendant’s arguments in the Motion. She instead attempts to clarify
20
the allegations in her Complaint.
21
respond to Defendant’s arguments seem to indicate that she acknowledges the
22
deficiencies of her Complaint.
Plaintiff’s attempts at clarification and failure to
23
The Court agrees with Defendant that the Complaint does not meet the
24
requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) and is so vague and ambiguous that
25
Defendant cannot form an appropriate response. While giving some background, the
26
Complaint does not contain short and plain statements of the grounds for Plaintiff’s
27
claims for relief.
28
constitutional provision Defendant allegedly violated.
Nor does the Complaint identify what state or federal statute or
-2-
1
The Court therefore will grant Defendant’s Motion for More Definite Statement
2
and hereby orders Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of
3
the date of this Order. The Amended Complaint shall comply with the requirements of
4
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a) and 10(b) and shall set forth the factual bases for
5
Plaintiff’s claims. Plaintiff’s claims themselves shall be set out in separate Counts and
6
shall identify which law, treaty, or constitutional provision Defendant allegedly violated.
7
The Amended Complaint also shall: 1) provide the names of the United States Postal
8
Service Employees who allegedly discriminated and/or retaliated against Plaintiff; 2)
9
contain a description of the alleged discriminatory conduct and the alleged adverse
10
employment action or actions; and 3) identify the time frames for the alleged
11
discriminatory conduct.
12
Accordingly,
13
IT IS ORDERED DENYING Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 7.)
14
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED GRANTING Defendant’s Motion for More
15
Definite Statement (Doc. 9).
16
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint that
17
meets the requirements set out above within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order.
18
If Plaintiff fails to file an Amended Complaint within that time, the Clerk of the Court
19
shall dismiss this case without further notice for failure to obey a Court order and failure
20
to prosecute.
21
Dated this 7th day of May, 2012.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?